Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GPS\s+Sync\s+$was\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\:\s+Wow\s+8\.9696kHzOssi\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GPS\s+Sync\s+$was\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\:\s+Wow\s+8\.9696kHzOssi\?$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. GPS Sync (was: Re: LF: Wow 8.9696kHzOssi?) (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:39:54 +0200; Hello Stefan, Yes, the charm of the GPS-sync'd sampling is that it allows truly coherent transmission - even after the program was shortly stopped, PC rebooted, generator re-fuelled, or whatever stra; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00402.html (12,267 bytes)
2. Re: GPS Sync (was: Re: LF: Wow 8.9696kHzOssi?) (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:11:09 +0100; No, 30 - 90ns is pretty typical of most modern GPS receivers now. But I'm impressed you can get that good averaging from a sampling rate much lower than that Andy www.g4jnt.com On 10 April 2011; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00654.html (13,566 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]