Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GPS Sync (was: Re: LF: Wow 8.9696kHzOssi?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GPS Sync (was: Re: LF: Wow 8.9696kHzOssi?)
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:11:09 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5DUlcTPhJmOTB3j160bK1N/c9ynufKQgXb83vFsk4nQ=; b=slNtL4VeItkB902hOXE0cBEjA3AQrlwrGBTuuSIpsgIJuFmqMKcBXk+AidbUo3MHO3 G3Pzz6FZW6aoYSts3U2X8AUSn8xgbjQyKmGa2ph9ENQKpQOHxT+qTaPL1CEHSHKiwA7C lTcYmqf779dXGKwIaJU4DXUzFOLqD/QO5b0r4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JZyJbBPvr+Rzv/IqN1G2Xm4Y/J+D89uML8bW0sgi6TLenconXnxl3LLnbEZoxTb5ZB P0Dh+GTrOo1SiYLDM7S+qSZcf9bttGBjy+pbKUfmo4TmCQpHllzJoykg71DjlYhwqBQJ eF47SsFU0AEtAPE1Y5+2Gq6x480Veafq0jAyw=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
No, 30 - 90ns is pretty typical of most modern GPS receivers now.
 
But I'm impressed you can get that good averaging from a sampling rate much lower than that
 
Andy


 
On 10 April 2011 12:39, wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Stefan,

Yes, the charm of the GPS-sync'd sampling is that it allows truly coherent transmission - even after the program was shortly stopped, PC rebooted, generator re-fuelled, or whatever strange things may happen. The sine wave generator will (optionally) not calculate the argument based on the number of soundcard samples, but derived from the GPS-derived time of day. Which, with the GPS 18x LVC mentioned before, seems to have a resolution (not neccessarily a precision) in the sub-microsecond range (192 kHz SR -> 5.x microsecond samples, but internally interpolated to a higher sample rate near the slope of the sync pulse).

At 192 kHz sampling rate, I get a standard deviation in the measured pulse position of only 30 to 60 nanoseconds (per one-second-interval) measured over one minute, which almost sounds too good to be true. Thus i'm a bit sceptic, this needs more testing.

Some preliminary info about the GPS-based calibration is already available here:
http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/speclab/frqcalib.htm#gps_pps_output

Note: The NMEA decoder for the soundcard is not implemented in the SL version on my website. It will be implemented when the weather(!) permits ;-)

73,  Wolf DL4YHF
(off for a walk now..)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>