Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Mini\-Whip\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Mini\-Whip\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. AW: LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:19:20 +0100; Hi Roelof, Have you checked what happens with the SNR if you increase the probe C, say to 10pF? 73, Stefan ________________________________ Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Roel; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00172.html (13,609 bytes)
2. Re: AW: LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:41:44 +0100; Hello Stefan, Just like you have reported some time ago, I have done tests to establish the best SNR for a whip antenna at LF in regard to the minimum length. I arrived at the same length as you did; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00551.html (13,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]