Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+LF\:\s+VLF\s+TX\s+experiments

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+LF\:\s+VLF\s+TX\s+experiments_short\s+report\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. AW: AW: LF: VLF TX experiments_short report (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:33:29 +0100; Yes Roger, sorry, but he did not receive me. Sorry Alexander. But as i wrote it was a first test and as we know from LF: The RX side is also important, just as the TX side. And my signal was 23dB wea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00243.html (13,049 bytes)
2. Re: AW: AW: LF: VLF TX experiments_short report (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:02:50 +0000 (GMT); Oh, sorry. I undestand that there was some signal but decode nothing. This is a mistake. 1.3 uV/m seems to yeld some weak trace in long QRSS. Somthing with rx part or noise is higher then we expected; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00485.html (9,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]