Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+LF\:\s+Re\:\s+9kHz\s+noise\s+level\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+LF\:\s+Re\:\s+9kHz\s+noise\s+level\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. AW: AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:23:46 +0100; Hi Wolf and tnx for informing others, After a talk with Markus/DF6NM and further thoughts abt the actual configuration it may be difficult to get a success tomorrow: The coil has a Q of just 38 (that; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00466.html (14,538 bytes)
2. AW: AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:04:02 +0100; Very nice Paul! I hope i can generate a peak outcoming of the noise in the picture ;-) Yesterday i have got a PVC tube with 25cm diameter and 2m long. Additionally i have bought 0,4mm diameter enamel; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00283.html (12,432 bytes)
3. Re: AW: AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:26:46 +0000; Stefan wrote (another thread): Yes, I think so. Always seems to be there. I am using F1 at 11904.761 for frequency lock. I would need to know details to help. As you say, it is not too difficult to r; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00410.html (13,701 bytes)
4. Re: AW: AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1): Author: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:35:54 +0100; Hi Stefan, Paul, and the group; Nice to hear about the progress, and hope to catch some signals here (one fine day) in JO42FD near Bielefeld. Stefan, just one suggestion: A 2 m long 25 cm diameter tu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00505.html (13,577 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]