Mail Archive Search: <+from:uwe-jannsen@versanet.de>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 194 ]

Total 194 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: TA (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:27:04 +0100; No ultra early reception today - likely due to static from storm off the US east coast. First sign of CT1DRP at 2130Z with good signal levels: Static somewhat less than an hour ago...perhaps storm is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00231.html (10,701 bytes)
82. LF: Propagation (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:41:32 +0100; Hi Andy,G4JNT last EU nights my signs could be seen on the CT1BRT grabber in IN51QD ie 2120km/235dgr and at same times my signs where not visible on the screen of W1VD in FN31MS ie 5943 km/293dgr. an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00249.html (9,017 bytes)
83. Re: LF: Re: Propagation (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:00:42 +0100; Hi Uwe was this one meant for me ?? Cheers de Alan G3NYK yes, Alan, sri for mixing up the callsigns. vy 73, Uwe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00254.html (9,346 bytes)
84. Re: LF: TA 17 JAN 06 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:37:21 +0100; Fair copy of DRP and WX last night also. 73 Joe thanks Joe, thanks Jay. I wonder if Bill/VE2IQ in FN15NT (5865km/299dgr) did activate his receiving equipment last night(s). regards Uwe/dj8wx; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00258.html (9,964 bytes)
85. Re: LF: Re: Propagation (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:58:22 +0100; Hi Uwe, yes it is a bit confusing as at first sight one would expect the signals to be present or absent on both grabbers. At night I think the main mode is a hop length of about 2000 km. See http:/; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00260.html (11,216 bytes)
86. Re: LF: Re: Mini Whip and local noise (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:22:16 +0100; Roelof, have you by any chance compared your active whip with the Amrad E-field probe? Both work on the same principles and it would be interesting to know how do they compare. 73 Alberto I2PHD P.S.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00318.html (11,002 bytes)
87. Re: LF: TA 23 JAN06 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:35:31 +0100; No report or captures today due to lack of EU activity. Will continue to monitor. Jay, W1VD Hi Jay, DJ8WX is off the air because you would like to see other EU stations on your screen. Regards Uwe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00390.html (8,746 bytes)
88. LF: diversity (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:57:25 +0100; Hi all, pse see <http://home.versanet.de/~uwe-jannsen/two.htm> your comments pse. regards Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00520.html (8,453 bytes)
89. Re: LF: Re: 160m aerial (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:33:44 +0100; Uwe, LFers, Nice web site! You've certainly taken the task seriously! 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL Solar and wind powered EN93dr Hi John Bruce, ...........yes, I do. but my ex young lady says I`m playi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00104.html (9,522 bytes)
90. LF: 160m aerial (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:42:15 +0100; Hi all, during TA observations I accidentaly connected the 160m dipol. pse see the result on the site http://home.versanet.de/~uwe-jannsen/two last image. regards Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00110.html (8,938 bytes)
91. Re: LF: SAQ at 13:00Z, this time with an NRD-525 Rx (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:38:38 +0100; For the transmission of 13:00Z I connected the active mini whip to the JRC NRD-525 Rx. The quality of the reception was inferior to that of the morning, but I recorded the audio and post-processed it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00131.html (10,725 bytes)
92. Re: LF: diversity (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:01:34 +0100; Zitat von [email protected]: Hi Uwe, judging from the identical frequency scales, it looks like your two receivers are in phase synchronism. You could then try SpecLab's Colour-DF setting and get; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00258.html (9,378 bytes)
93. Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:02:58 +0100; Dear LF enthusiasts, the prospective time-table of HF_MF2LF #1 experiment Feb 4 : PART 1 start 13z - end 1730z HF freq: TX1 14350 kHz, TX2 14213.681 kHz (14350 - 14213.681 = 136.319) RX freq: 136.31; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00349.html (12,433 bytes)
94. Re: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:19:52 +0100; Dear Ed, LF Group, Just quickly checked your HF frequencies, which are 14213.650kHz and 14349.972kHz to the nearest Hz - this will make the difference frequency 136.322kHz, +/- 2Hz. Will be monitori; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00367.html (11,690 bytes)
95. Re: LF: GPS locked tests (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:20:58 +0100; Dear all I have just received this from Peter Martinez G3PLX who is conducting tests with phase coherent GPS-locked signals on LF. He asked me to pass it on to the group so that you'll know what's g; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00378.html (10,211 bytes)
96. Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:27:03 +0100; Hi Ed, nothing seen here in jo43sv. used different aerials and SpecLab in split mode. the signs on 14MHZ, 3,6MHz, 1,8MHz were strong. regards Uwe/dj8wx Dear LF enthusiasts, the prospective time-table; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00382.html (12,284 bytes)
97. Re: LF: XGJ last night (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:46:14 +0100; Hi Warren, LF, Strong reception of XGJ last night from switch-on until about 0330utc, then another peak, not as strong, about 0430utc. Screenshot of 0300 capture attached. Full screenshots available; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00082.html (10,017 bytes)
98. Re: LF: XES WOLF 19-20 Mar (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:30:17 +0100; Thanks to all for the JASON reports from last night. WD2XES will run WOLF (10) on 137.577 kHz tonight, starting around 2300 UTC. Reports are welcome. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES http://www.w1tag.com H; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00109.html (8,980 bytes)
99. Re: LF: RE: Signal 136.330KHz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:09:14 +0100; Now with screen shot 73 Gary. Hi Gary, nice screenshot. the text is "push pull test dj8wx" in JASON mode, but long dashes too. with 120mW EMRP on the air. 20 - 30cm snow on the ground detunes the ae; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00163.html (9,242 bytes)
100. Re: LF: Re: Unid carrier on 136,520... (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:52:19 +0100; Dave: The 136520 signal is undoubtedly G3JKV who has been transmitting to me. I don't think he realises how strong he is! 73 Peter G3PLX Hi Peter, is this a GPS disciplined transmission? if so pse t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00232.html (9,515 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]