Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 337 ]

Total 337 documents matching your query.

221. RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 will spark-up at 2200 for the evening... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:02:19 -0500
Bob, Tonight I&#8217;ve been estimating your SNR* at 15-minute intervals and comparing to your SNRs from last night. For the large majority of the 15-minute intervals your SNRs were higher tonight, a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00374.html (26,709 bytes)

222. RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 will spark-up at 2200 for the evening... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:07:18 -0500
Thanks Hartmut, 73 Jim AA5BW Am 2013-10-14 08:02, schrieb hvanesce: John, XRS/3 was in DFCW on 74547.0. First using an upshift of 0,1 Hz. Around 01:40 he changed the upshift to 0,2 Hz. Than the signa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00375.html (12,779 bytes)

223. RE: LF: RE: Back at it again tonight-74.5495 QRSS 60... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:56:30 -0500
Bob, The attached plot shows some interesting aspects of the 74.54xx kHz links on Sunday night / Monday morning. Aspects that caught my attention as grabber images arrived from Henny, Hartmut and Mik
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00378.html (20,874 bytes)

224. RE: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:07:53 -0500
Tobias, I have been working on cancellation of power-line noise and impulsive noise, so I was interested in your comment about W1JT's new blanker. By "SVN-server" do you mean developer.berlios.de ? (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00393.html (12,645 bytes)

225. RE: LF: air solenoids (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:58:59 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00396.html (17,489 bytes)

226. Re: LF: air solenoids (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 23:39:37 +0000
Chris, Sounds intriguing. You're near the portion of the near field referred to as the reactive field (sometimes as induction field which is less precise but pertinent here). At your 1km distance, co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00679.html (22,920 bytes)

227. LF: RE: 630 meters wide open and HOT! (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:23:07 -0600
Amazing&#8230; Jim From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:37 PM To: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00120.html (11,082 bytes)

228. LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600
Bob, This is puzzling; it doesn&#8217;t seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, equipment. Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00123.html (13,517 bytes)

229. LF: RE: 8970,022Hz (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:22:24 -0700
Do you plan to be on-air (VLF) tomorrow? Or in the near future? 73, Jim AA5BW From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00124.html (12,966 bytes)

230. LF: RE: Hartmut's Grabber On Last Night... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:56:02 -0600
Bob, This is the third time that I&#8217;ve noticed Dex&#8217;s signal peaking substantially (>15dB?) starting around 0500, at approximately the same time that your signal begins a substantial fade.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00127.html (13,820 bytes)

231. LF: RE: Submarine comms (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:51:13 -0700
Mike, I have a mix of practical, theoretical and scientific knowledge on this subject, but would not consider myself a leading expert. Judging from the questions that you listed and the proposed roug
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00129.html (11,409 bytes)

232. RE: LF: 8970,022Hz (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:01:22 -0700
Hello Uwe, I am on travel in a low-noise location, and will have a low-noise VLF RX set up and running by 0300 UTC Saturday (seven hours from now). I&#8217;ll plan to leave the RX running for at leas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00240.html (16,516 bytes)

233. RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600
Yes Bob, I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00255.html (18,336 bytes)

234. RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:08:51 -0600
Good luck! From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00257.html (21,212 bytes)

235. RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:21:03 -0600
Thanks Hartmut, Jim AA5BW Jim, Bob and LF, Am 06.11.2013 03:51, schrieb hvanesce: The noise was produced by the local weather: heavy rain and wind 73 Hartmut
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00258.html (12,194 bytes)

236. RE: LF: Re: RE: Hartmut's Grabber On Last Night... (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 01:37:47 -0600
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00272.html (25,516 bytes)

237. RE: LF: capt243 04-11-13 (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:54:02 -0600
Bob, Dst Index hasn&#8217;t stabilized since October 30 disturbance, and if memory serves it took a bit longer (6 days?) for your signal levels to fully recover after the last 3 disturbances. I know
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-11/msg00289.html (13,983 bytes)

238. LF: 8969.76? (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:52:33 -0700
Did anyone switch on at ~ 1045 UT in the neighborhood of 8969.76 kHz? I don&#8217;t see anything on the VLF grabbers so I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s QRM or someone not too far from my Arizona locati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00080.html (9,568 bytes)

239. LF: Frequency Check (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:20:34 -0700
Stefan, My stable/accurate time reference (GPSDO) should arrive in two weeks; in the meantime I am hoping to use 11904.76190 Hz (per your suggestion, thanks) to assess my soundcard clock frequency of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00116.html (12,011 bytes)

240. LF: RE: 118 decodes downloaded for first WSPR 15 night on 4000 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:49:03 -0700
Well done Bob and participating WSPRnet stations, 73, Jim AA5BW From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Wednesday, December 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00167.html (12,175 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu