Mail Archive Search: <+from:advancedreceiver@snet.net>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: 137.773 AM 24 Mar (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 06:22:33 -0500; Ian Nothing seen in CT. Noise fairly low but propagtion may have been down. John Andrews, with his highly effective "hoover" antenna, may have had better luck. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Automated system see; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00149.html (8,962 bytes)
22. Re: LF: Re: ZL6QH tests (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:20:55 -0500; Ditto Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Nothing seen on 90 or 120 second screens overnight. There was a lot of thunderstorm activity in the SE U.S., and the noise levels were pretty high. John Andrews, W1TAG; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00220.html (8,716 bytes)
23. Re: LF: TA 13 March (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:29:13 -0500; Ditto here. Is this the beginning of springtime condx? Jay Rusgrove, W1VD It was very noisy here last night. I started recording at 0330, but only a fragment of CT1DRP's signal was seen around 0645.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00266.html (9,394 bytes)
24. LF: 137 TA 031103 report (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:51:45 -0500; Last night... http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/137031103A.jpg I agree with John...sure would be nice to see a few more signals from across the pond. With the signal levels we're seeing there s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00320.html (10,084 bytes)
25. LF: 137 TA 031003 report (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:33:56 -0500; Here's a representative capture from last night in CT. http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/137031003.jpg Jay Rusgrove, W1VD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00334.html (9,131 bytes)
26. Re: LF: T/A Propagation (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 08:22:16 -0500; Laurie Good copy last night here in CT. Mitch If that's your signal at 137772.87 you might want to consider slowing down to QRSS60 so we can have a better look at you. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Joe Craig wr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00359.html (9,110 bytes)
27. Re: LF: TA 6 Mar (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 07:58:55 -0500; Ditto. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Nothing useful seen overnight. It's very noisy here this morning, so propagation may not be the issue. John Andrews, W1TAG; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00391.html (8,233 bytes)
28. Re: LF: TA 5 March (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 07:52:17 -0500; Ditto Jay Rusgrove, W1VD CT1DRP had a solid signal here all night, ending around 0700 UTC. No other signals were seen. John Andrews, W1TAG; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00408.html (8,176 bytes)
29. LF: 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:12:05 -0500; Brian You're in early tonight and looking good at the moment! Jay Rusgrove, W1VD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00412.html (8,198 bytes)
30. Re: LF: TA 4 March (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:38:53 -0500; Joe Nice quiet night here...loran line strong and clean. Not a trace of any other signals. Maybe "the usuals" had their stations geared up for 72 kHz operations this morning? Jay And here. I even did; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00423.html (8,964 bytes)
31. Re: LF: TA 4 March (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:01:44 -0500; Same here. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Nothing. John Andrews; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00427.html (8,848 bytes)
32. LF: 137 TA 030303 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:50:36 -0500; Similar results to John and Joe here in CT. http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/137030303A.jpg http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/137030303B.jpg Jay Rusgrove, W1VD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00446.html (7,655 bytes)
33. LF: 137.773 report 030203 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 07:47:49 -0500; CT1DRP solid early evening. High static levels began 0230Z and throughout most of the night. Will stay tuned... Jay Rusgrove, W1VD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00461.html (7,507 bytes)
34. Re: LF: LF Tuning meter (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:21:27 -0400; Jim I would also appreciate a copy of the .pdf. If someone has hosted it on their website a link would also be acceptable. I have used the scope version for some time now and it works quite well. Loo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00022.html (10,947 bytes)
35. Re: LF: RE: RE: Re: RX-LOOP (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:35:02 -0400; Jan-Martin Have you found that it makes any difference where the core is placed along the transmission line? Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Right, but you may also use a balun. See RSGB book about EMC (or TVI ..; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00038.html (10,571 bytes)
36. Re: LF: Argo + Question for Alan Melia (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:53:55 -0400; Mike I like your suggestions for Argo. Although the changes would be nice, I can't blame Alberto if he doesn't want to spend his time making a fix for "operator induced errors"! Alan John Andrews and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00120.html (10,477 bytes)
37. Re: LF: Re: TA 22 Apr (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:46:55 -0400; Forgot to hit the "Start" button last night - DOH! -so no report this AM. I've noticed others have had this happen from time to time. Wonder if Alberto could find a "fix" for this... Jay Rusgrove, W1; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00122.html (9,123 bytes)
38. Re: LF: TA 22 Apr (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:19:17 -0400; Ditto here...could be a good night! Static not bad at the moment... Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Started seeing CT1DRP around 0150 UTC on 137773.6. Captures overnight at: http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/136-; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00126.html (8,619 bytes)
39. Re: LF: TA 21 April (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:32:20 -0400; Brian Once you experience it , you can't live without it! I consider it to be one of my best investments. Will be interesting to try T/A from time to time during the "fringe" of the season. I'm sure; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00138.html (9,274 bytes)
40. Re: LF: TA 21 April (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:19:45 -0400; Brian Started seeing your signal about 0330. Appeared to be in there pretty steady until it abruptly dropped out around 0500. Conditions were pretty noisy at my location. Captures (albeit not great); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00140.html (8,775 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]