Mail Archive Search: <+from:Mike

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "Mike Staines" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:17:54 -0500; Mike, I must have missed something, who is Bill and where do I find info about Ashlock loops? Ralph Ralph: Bill has two papers published. They can be found at: http://www.ThePittsfieldInn.com/Bill Mi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00091.html (9,661 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "Mike Staines" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:53:32 -0500; The article I mentioned does say that electrically tiny loops are inefficient - but aren't electrically tiny verticals inefficient too? Unfortunately, I suspect that this discussion will now degrade; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00094.html (10,294 bytes)
3. LF: RE: The Mystery - "Eve" (score: 1): Author: "Mike Staines" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:48:28 -0400; Todays teaser; why "Eve" in the subject heading? Well, according to the Scriptures, Eve was a "side" issue for Adam. OK, You can stop ribbing us... Mike wa1ptc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00064.html (8,488 bytes)
4. LF: RE: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1): Author: "Mike Staines" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:05:28 -0400; Perhaps it would be too much to ask of our patent offices to require proof that an invention actually works, but I wish we could at least return to the days when it was not possible to patent and re-; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00129.html (10,611 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]