Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:41:41 GMT
What the hell are you doing sending an empty mail with a Happy99 virus attached, please everyone don't execute it, it replaces your winsock and causes trouble. Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00143.html (8,546 bytes)

2. Re: LF: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:41:03 GMT
I am not sure, but it should be picked up on these "secondary" postings using a virus checker that operates all the time in the background. Grateful for any other information that members of the lis
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00145.html (8,564 bytes)

3. Re: LF: test (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:17:21 GMT
test only This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_005B_01BE7A48.24A54F00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable test only --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00214.html (9,008 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Noise - latest (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:59:27 GMT
To briefly answer a few points which were raised: Yes, the poles where the noise peaked are definately telephone poles and NOT power-line poles Just a wild idea. Have any of your neighbours had 'hom
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00078.html (9,457 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Noise from phone lines (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 11:24:01 GMT
Last year I started hearing approximately one-second ticks with a double tick on the minute If it was not for the double tick on the minute I would have put it down to a classic noise source of elec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00082.html (9,155 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Noise - latest (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 05:55:43 GMT
Nick / John, I can rule out BT's "DAX" box which uses analogue carrier multiplex as I had one here for a while with no RF problems on any band. It was USELESS for use with a modem though so it's gon
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00091.html (8,963 bytes)

7. Re: LF: re Dave's Comment on filters (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 08:18:45 +0100
Am I missing something? or am I maybe not sufficiently practiced to take full advantage of the difference? Hi I've been lurking here for a while but am not active on LF (yet). I do make my living ou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00005.html (10,481 bytes)

8. Re: LF: visual-CW (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 22:35:51 +0000
Since visual-CW is derived from 'normal' CW we use the same morse code that was optimized for reception by ear. Nice concepts on the FSK. An interesting historical note is that Morse code was origin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00050.html (8,553 bytes)

9. Re: LF: keep cool (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 20:57:23 +0000
Thanks for the clarification, Nick. I found myself thinking that if we exceeded the Curie point of air, we might be facing bigger problems than how to couple power into an antenna. <grin> The proble
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00467.html (9,339 bytes)

10. Re: LF: keep cool (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 19:02:00 +0000
Unless the heat takes you above the curie point in which case you will lose most of the inductance suddenly. Following up on myself that does not apply to air cored coils of course. I only read the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00474.html (9,293 bytes)

11. Re: LF: keep cool (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 18:32:29 +0000
PS : maybe if you take into account that copper at 100°C has a higher resistance than copper at 20°C you might gain a few micro-Watts. Unless the heat takes you above the curie point in which case y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00477.html (9,166 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:29:08 +0000
I would regret it if we would stop the QRSS transatlantic tests now The majority would disagree with you. Than I must be part of the minority, keep experimenting Nick (back to lurking)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00220.html (10,200 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: More normal CW (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:37 +0000
but I would appreciate advice on better waterproofing. Anyone got any good ideas? The standard edict is to waterproof everything as best you can and then leave a hole or two at the bottom to let wha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00239.html (8,530 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Mains Borne Noise (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:49:28 +0000
Has anybody on the list got a "whole house" mains filter installed at their QTH? I work in EMC and this would be a very difficult concept to implement as most commercial filters are designed to filt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00321.html (9,433 bytes)

15. Re: LF: FW: Virus Warning (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:56:00 +0000
Another hoax, this start gives it away Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00432.html (8,703 bytes)

16. Re: LF: 9kHz DX with no power supply! (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:34:44 +0000
The link was there (again?) at 20:15z. Thanks Found it at http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1120000/video/_1121767_dishes08_heap_vi.ram Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00499.html (9,906 bytes)

17. Re: LF: 9kHz DX with no power supply! (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:44:05 +0000
Sorry, I should have pointed you to the News pages. Just take the News link from there or, type http://news.bbc.co.uk A link to the actual page will help as it has gone off the index. Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00502.html (9,520 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: Spectrum of SXA/SXV (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 19:02:13 +0000
--A12D4AD9D68BA2292D64F7F1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> john sexton wrote: <blockqu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00824.html (9,718 bytes)

19. Re: LF: LF digest (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 22:11:14 +0000
I would be interested on hearing how the diagrams come out on the various browsers - every one I try makes the page look different. Looks OK here in Netscape 3 Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00076.html (8,444 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Reflector for hi tech LF discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:38:36 +0000
Does anyone have a suggestion as to how it could be hosted and activated? http://groups.yahoo.com/ is the easy way Nick
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00139.html (9,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu