Uwe Looking good in the UK today too. http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: Uwe, Looks stable and very strong over the night. That step
Further information :- I am running 15.625Hz Wide GMSK The frequency shift is half the bit rate. Here I include some quotes. Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying, or to give it its full title Gaussian filte
Thanks Joe It was a rather average night last night on MF. 73 Eddie On 20/03/2013 23:47, Joe DF2JP wrote: Hi Eddie, got a first decode with v0.8r3058 2336 -25 1.2 0.475636 0 G3ZJO IO92 7 Unfortunatel
With the interest in RTTY at this time I wonder if we have any 'eyes' within RX range of me. I am currently testing RTTY on 478.200KHz also in the Fldigi software is MFSK4 I shall swap to that also a
Hi Uwe The snow is not as noisy today, my Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm is on your signal very good. Thanks for the interesting test. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 23/03/2013 12:15, Markus
Ooops Sorry 476.100KHz On 15/03/2013 17:35, g3zjo wrote: Running GMSK on 467.100 Beacon 15.625 Hz Wide Dial 474.200KHz cursor 1900Hz Software MMVari by JE3HHT. The install comes up with a language wa
Many thanks to all who looked out for my tiny signal yesterday. To quote Roger G3XBM, it never ceases to amaze me what can be done with simple antennas and QRPp powers on 630m. I think waggling an I/
Are you operating on the same freq? No I moved back to my MFSK4 frequency, did you want to try TX of JT9-x ? I will set up as soon as you let me know. Eddie
On 05/03/2013 22:14, Graham wrote: why is the 'REV' button 'in' on MMTTY then mark = 1163 Hz with 477 usb dial set ? G. Corr I haven't run that for years. Hmm, it seems to indicat
Hi Stefan I am sure Gary is keeping track of the modes he is testing. All I can say is that RTTY, Amtor and most common MFSK modes are too fast for use by lower power stations of for greater distance
LF I am running JT4A on 476.100KHz tonight. Reports welcome QSO's possible mail to blacksheep if I don't respond please. First report from G6AVK at 137Km we are -15dB each way. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Attachm
Thanks Tobias That is very encouraging, I will be using 9-1 more. 73 Eddie Reports at JO53GV : Mode JT9-1 : (WSJT-X rev 3038) 2208 1 12 0.1 1356. 1 CQ G3ZJO IO92 2227 0 12 0.3 1313. 0 TEST G6AVK Good
Well I tuned my antenna and someone was testing on the frequency may have been CMSK. Anyone going to own up. Eddie G3ZJO On 03/03/2013 16:18, Gary - G4WGT wrote: Hi All, I expect to be sending RTTY t
On closer examination, the night before produced an extra 20Km. 2013-03-15 03:52 G3ZJO 0.475638 -27 0 IO92ng +7 0.005 OH6JKN KP22xk 1944 1208 My garden fence gets further away, don't ever be foolish
Not a trace of your signal at the moment Stefan. My Grabber is set for you. Wide View showing correct frequency readout. Eddie On 06/03/2013 11:20, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Am 06.03.2013 11:03, schrieb
Hi Gary I haven't tried any waterfall adjustments, the display is a bit dark on mine and on the Grabs from G6AVK signal traces of what is visible on Speclab do produce a line though. The program may
Hi Stefan Saw and heard your signal, its narrower than the Navtex on fldigi. Too late at night to work out why.:-) GN Eddie OK, i will add another mode to test on MF this night. Will use NAVTEX (gene
12.5 Hz is WIDE.? Ed On 02/03/2013 13:28, Graham wrote: Taking a walk on the wide side Ed ? G.. From: [email protected] g3zjo Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 12:39 PM To: [email protected]
On 06/03/2013 22:59, Alan Melia wrote: Did it recover or did it need repolarising or replacement? Alan I can't remember the amount of confusion it caused, no doubt my opto couplers and silicon 30V sw
Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html Wide View, showing your signal. Eddie On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Minto, I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago? I was wr