Mal I have had a look at the timing of stations on air. I was right GW8MLA is 4 seconds out, you could have been several seconds out in the same direction and still have copied him but positively exc
Hi Mal On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote: MF Some good DX about this past couple of days this morning 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it
Mal Not necessarily if the station you copy is off time and you are compensating with miss timing you two will be right and the rest of the world wrong. Just set yours precisely. I will check timings
Hello Mal oh sorry its Graham I refer you to a message already handed to the clerk of the court. Ed -- From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:56 PM To: <rsgb_lf_group
2010 UTC The 10dB attenuator is out of circuit now. I suspected that G0VQH would still decode my WSPR with some headroom. I also suspected that this would be a one guy one girl relationship. I have n
Today I ran up my tiny PA which produces 20uW EIRP then inserted 10dB of attenuation at 50 Ohms. I suspected that G0VQH would still decode my WSPR with some headroom. I also suspected that this would
Andy Was this direct? 2013-02-16 16:44 VK1DSH 0.475078 -29 0 QF44ms 50 F6CNI/BEV JN19qb 16832 310 Eddie G3ZJO On day light time your signal is now very good when you transmit WSPR 2 and WSPR 15 on 63
Hi Uwe / LF I am not leaving my Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm on 24/7 these days. I am following your test during my waking hours. :-) Due to this I am just using the DFCW6000
Hi Stefan Well as far as I can tell it should be 4mW. My original TX gave 200uW calculated and confirmed by James some time ago. I did increase that with a capacity hat but that was mechanically a pr
On 02/02/2013 15:42, mal hamilton wrote: Eddie If I am only decoding the QRO stn with my antennas those with uProbes, Orange box loops and Earth gas pipe antennas have no chance other than their neig
On 02/02/2013 10:40, mal hamilton wrote: Strangely enough I can only decode GW8MLA and there are another several stns active at present on WSPR-2. Most are strong and audible de g3kev Well that will
On 02/02/2013 15:50, mal hamilton wrote: Eddie Now seeing 10 different stns active but not getting that many decodes, so I am seeing everyone strong es weak but decoding is a different story that is
Hi LF WSPR'ers I am testing a stand alone WSPR modular system, I must apologies for the arbitrary power level displayed as the Code is fixed on PIC and the power level is variable.. Any comments on t
Hi G Yeh, ere, get off my thread.:-) Longer TX periods gave more time for propagation or QRM to give zero results, We have times of 2,4,8,16 , dropped 16 as that was ott , most made TA to usa with 2
Hi Minto On 06/03/2013 11:09, Minto Witteveen wrote: Hmm might this be because in the old days (amateur) RTTY was done with the rig in LSB mode using AFSK? Yes, hence the confusion. With mark at 212
Stefan Sorry I missed the early RTTY TX prior to blowing your FET's. I was enjoying the sunshine. Transmissions tonight peaking 10dB above Av. Noise in 2.5 KHz B/W gave patchy copy. Now 15dB above No
Hi Gary Thanks, I didn't get the chance to give it permission it has been blocked. Have you noticed V.0.8 has a Hash File is this a 'deep decode', 'cheat file' like some WSJT moon modes have. Eddie Y
TX'ing JT9-2 475.550KHz. 474.200 plus 1350 tone TX First Here. Too soon to say if its more reliable / less troubled by slight drift. Reports QSO welcome. 73 G3ZJO Eddie
Hi Chris Superb signal. There is a big problem with close powerful stations on this band, you have completely blacked out my Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html Interesting experimen
