Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 529 ]

Total 529 documents matching your query.

201. Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:05:56 +0000
And you could send the longest place name in the world, which starts something like this :- 1440  10  -13   0.2 1402.44  0.00   LLANFYR But you have to split it up a bit, and ends like this :-       
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00682.html (13,650 bytes)

202. Re: LF: JT9: A New Digital Mode for MF and LF (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:02:46 +0100
Not so here I am afraid, I was hoping to run on 500kHz. 1) On 2 very different computers the TX switching of the COM Port Latches the TX on permanently, TX STOP puts it back into RX mode but only clo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00741.html (15,639 bytes)

203. Re: LF: Re: DK7FC 137.440 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:48:12 +0000
1614 G8HUH failed decode 1624 DK7FC failed 1628 both in same slot only G8HUH decoded 1632 partial broken sig from G8HUH Well that is very annoying after last nights problems on 500KHz I can even expl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00743.html (20,337 bytes)

204. Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:46:15 +0000
Did you smile though Mal, go on I a dare you, it doesn't hurt honest. On 29/10/2012 17:28, mal hamilton wrote: OR        something useful like   I do not have an antenna and need JT9 the Miracle mode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00751.html (16,138 bytes)

205. Re: LF: WSJT-X BENCH TESTS (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:20:18 +0000
Hello Albert Did you or could you check v2702, it was totally different here to v2706.. 73 Eddie Today I used the afternoon to solve some issues encountered by using WSTJ-X v0.2 r2706. Test setup Fle
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00769.html (11,589 bytes)

206. LF: PA0O log the lost QSO Autopsy (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:36:53 +0000
Finally this morning I got round to looking at the WSJT-X files from last night to see the glorious false de-codes, what a shock. First what I saw last night. 2114 10 -21 -0.4 1418.29 0.00 15P6715P67
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00793.html (16,499 bytes)

207. Re: LF: no decodes, help needed (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:06:50 +0000
I was getting the echo on one instance of wsjtx this morning every time on local test, when I stopped  TX'ing the signal seemed to be repeated on the RX set up in the next RX period. Spooks!! Eddie O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00794.html (13,368 bytes)

208. Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:33:20 +0000
Thanks Mal You will love this one, while testing JT9-2 yesterday afternoon I called CQ, G3XIZ called me, I sent him a report, no reply, again no reply, a few tries then a beautiful bit of Morse came
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00799.html (19,060 bytes)

209. Re: LF: JST 9-2 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:13:24 +0000
Did you send a signal on 500 +1400, I was on 70cm phone, saw a signal which crashed v04 as soon as it tried decode then the signal did not decode on other occasions could have been wrongly timed. Loo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00014.html (9,344 bytes)

210. Re: LF: 500kHz JT9-2 v2711 Who called me (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:58:40 +0000
Sorry Joe I kicked myself, having deleted the old and installed the new the Save All was unticked. Eddie My first transmission using v2711 monitored in the shack *exactly as previously described and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00024.html (10,329 bytes)

211. LF: WSJT-X Files for Joe (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:13:30 +0000
One of my theories for decodes of my own signal failing locally and I suspect DX has been frequency drift in my transverter, I worked on that one and improved it immensely. I use my Kenwood TS870 bot
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00054.html (8,756 bytes)

212. LF: WSJTX Tests / Running JT9-1 now 500khz + 1400hz (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:45:37 +0000
Today I was testing WSJTX v0.4 JT9-2 into a 50ohm dummy load at 3.7Mhz (transverter drive frequency) with RX on 3.7MHz decodes failed after a time. Changing to JT9-1 with the same set up the program
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00062.html (8,644 bytes)

213. Re: LF: Attempts for JT9-1 QSO on LF (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:42:18 +0000
G8HUH has just gone off due to storms, you can't see me on 500kHz can you (when I am on I mean) with the new trnsverter. Eddie On 01/11/2012 15:04, Stefan Schäfer wrote: LF, Is someone available for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00069.html (9,949 bytes)

214. Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:50:31 +0000
Hello Rik Yes sure. Let me know your best time for this evening either here or on AJAX. I have just run JT9-2 to see if v4 still gives me only 6-7 decodes, it does. Running JT9-1 now, when the rig is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00079.html (17,212 bytes)

215. Re: LF: 475 khz WSPR and VLF (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:42:43 +0000
So Mal the acceptability of a mode is based on the intelligent human being able to read it direct from the screen. WSPR (not the QSO verion) is a fixed message packet which does not change consequent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00083.html (43,032 bytes)

216. Re: LF: RXing JT9-2 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:55 +0000
What I would say in support of 'Dial' and why I state 500KHz + 1400Hz (and that takes more effort to write) is for those not familiar with the mode(s). The other day I was trying to get an Old Timer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00105.html (12,547 bytes)

217. Re: LF: Fwd: JT9-2 failed now JT9-1 500khz + 1400hz (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:44:03 +0000
HI Joe, Tobias, LF That's great, it brings back some logic into the observed symptoms. Thank goodness the files I have been flooding Joe with have proved useful, I was beginning to feel I was a compl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00120.html (11,176 bytes)

218. LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:15:28 +0000
Some fairly consistent de-codes sent direct from PA3ABK best S/N -23dB using Ver3. I would be very pleased with one de-code from you Mauro. Eddie On 14/11/2012 20:57, IK1WVQ Mauro wrote: Hi, I am rec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00168.html (12,829 bytes)

219. LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] WSPR 500kHz (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:31:41 +0000
Now back on WSPR. 500KHz Things are looking good on JT9-2 now Joe, 10 local de-codes of my signal and no misses. Oh, and I do look pretty in pink.:-) Eddie Eddie On 28/11/2012 17:48, g3zjo wrote: GE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00175.html (10,268 bytes)

220. Re: LF: Thanks for JT9-1 QSO Eddie (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:38:10 +0000
Thanks QSO Roger I will add my capture here also :- https://www.sugarsync.com/piv/D0881137_61669852_666923 This one doesn't need downloading I keep forgetting the last sugar step. :-( Your first 3 an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00197.html (10,749 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu