Wolf, congratulations, especially for the ad-hoc version of your software. And I am sure that, after some past comments, you will now have more clear the meaning of the English saying of "throwing pe
the meaning of the English saying of "throwing pearls to the porks".... Or perhaps it is "throwing pearls to the pigs", but the meaning does not change... 73 Alberto I2PHD
it is just out of curiosity what can be heard by such a system (feed the antenna signal into an ADC and let some software do the rest). Rik, you misunderstood the meaning of my message... I have sent
Just don't expect the same sensitivity from such a WEBSDR as from some grabbers dedicated to 500kHz. 73, Rik ON7YD Rik, don't you have better ways to waste your time ??? 73 Alberto I2PHD
Alan Melia wrote: Now Now Alberto dont encourage him. I am sure Andy has enough bad habits already :-)) Hi Alan, there is no danger.... I am sure you are familiar with that famous article of Edsger
I would like especially to comment on using a one winding loop combined with a step-up transformer: I am interested in knowing opinions about using the loop itself as a primary of the transformer, as
James and Ha-Jo, thanks for your answers and considerations about using the loop itself as the primary of the transformer. I thought that it could be a good idea, based on this consideration : If I m
I was informed that as they stand the voltage regulation is poor, to improve this the 'Core Shunts' should be removed, (these are laminations between the two stacks), removal of these 'shunts' also h
So it looks like this particular design is feasible and the loop construction not very critical. I have not tried this particular configuration (my loops need to incorporate some selectivity to be vi
I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish. Not by some... by just one... the group troll... 73 Alberto I2PHD
G'day All, I can't believe why you guys get so steamed up about Mal's comments. Surely you know Mal is a troll (internet term - look it up...). <<< snip >>> Hi Steve, nice to read you after some tim
Good evening Steve, well, well, you make me blush... there are a lot of other very good programs capable of displaying QRSS. Maybe Argo has the merit of having been the first, so it got more widespre
M0FMT wrote: Alan is right about Winrad if you set the software LO to zero and select LH or RH rather than the full IQ and depending on you sound card sample rate you will either get 0 to 24kc/s or 0
Andy Talbot wrote: This presentation was aimed at Microwave operators, but has plenty of relevance to LF http://g4jnt.com/MartleSham.htm Includes soundclips of CW buried in noise with accurately defi
Alberto di Bene wrote: are you sure about that frequency ? I read on another group that the Graves radar operates on 143.050 MHz Hmmm, it looks like I as correct... 73 Alberto I2PHD
Crafty. 'should' be pretty foolproof. Any old soundcard without 48000Hz ought to just throw-up an error. Not under Windows XP.... Windows will duly and silently try to please the user of the sound c
Andy, I can get a copy from the M.I.T. library but it may be a few days before I get over there... Would it be asking too much for a publicly downloadable copy ? TNX. 73 Alberto I2PHD
