Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:25:31 +0200
Hi Stefan, Understood and I would like to try an active E-probe soon. I also believe that I have experienced the amusing side of homebrewing enough and now I think I will choose a more reliable way t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00054.html (17,250 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:24:06 +0200
Hi Johan, Would a normal carbon resistor be quiet enough as a dummy antenna impedance for this test? Cheers D. Daniele, the ususal rule of thumb is that you don't need any preamplifier if you get a b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00119.html (12,828 bytes)

3. LF: RE: experiments (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:26:33 +0200
Just crowded as 40 meters very soon J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer Sent: venerdì 16 aprile 2010 20.21 To: rsgb_lf_g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00198.html (13,689 bytes)

4. LF: RE: Re: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:02:06 +0200
Thank you very much, Jim. Very kind of you to provide this comprehensive answer to my inquiry. Best regards Daniele Dear Daniele, LF Group, opinion is that a bigger non-amplified loop is better than
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00268.html (14,962 bytes)

5. RE: LF: vlf stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:41:55 +0200
Hi Lawrence, probably you could use the lowest-frequency alpha station for calibration purposes. I heard from Wolf that he was working on a built-in frequency calibration tool for SpectrumLab but I d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00394.html (15,491 bytes)

6. RE: LF: vlf stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:54:19 +0200
This is the same question I wanted to ask after having had a look to the picture: any problems with the laptop sitting on the bench? Regards Daniele Hello : PC = lots of noise !!! 73 Xtian / F1VL Lau
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00483.html (12,084 bytes)

7. LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:26:34 +0200
Hi LF, Quite a general question: is a pre-amplifier needed in your opinion for listening to LF weak signals (e.g. NDB DX, etc.)? I read different opinions in very famous articles on the Web: one opin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00508.html (11,569 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu