Hi Group, Alan has asked me to let everyone know and to apologise on his behalf for any messages received from his address with an attachment. He appears to have caught a Virus, which is automaticall
Here, here. I have already started. John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Hi Mike, I wasn't far away. First at Honiton and then at Blandford for the duration. John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.b
Hi Ko, Thanks for the gram. After processing it with Paint Shop Pro, I too can read VA3LK twice there. It is just just clear enough to be sure. That is interesting because the previous night I had su
Hi Ko, Hi All, Absolutely nothing here tonight. Have checked every half hour since 20.00 till now 00.15 for VE1ZZ or VA3LK, but no sign. The static has been increasing steadily and is now at such a l
Hi All, Judging from John VE1ZJ's e-mail, MM0ALM could well have achieved the two-way QSO last night, if only he had a QRSS receive capability. Also intrigued to see that Jack was sending QRSS by han
Hi Tracey, First I have heard that there are any in the UK. I had understood from their webpage, that they were just used by the Benelux countries, Belgium, Holland and Luxembourg. I can confirm tran
Hi Alberto, VE1ZZ was on 136.5, so you must have seen MM0ALM, and as Dave YXM has told me, MM0ALM was close to 136. It seems he was 40Hz higher than OK1FIG, which would put him on 135.995. 73, John,
Hi All, I have posted the Spectrograms made last night with a few comments and thoughts on my web site: www.g4cnn.w2s.com and have just tested that it works. Competition: See if you can your call sig
Hi Vaino What frequency was MM0ALM on? and was he sending normal CW? John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/
Hi Alan, I didn't see MM0ALM calling, but he may have been above 137.7 or I was possibly looking at the sigs below 136 at the time. The interesting thing is that the ack was in QRSS, so did Dave use
Hi all again, At 0030 010113, VE1ZZ again acknowledged OK1FIG with I believe OO, but now strong QSB, first and last part of message difficult to make out, but middle clear. Problem is that VE1ZZ has
The saga continues: VE1ZZ acknowledged OK1FIG OO at/by 00.15 010113, but no-one this side seems to have seen it since all are transmitting their calls again, i.e. OK1FIG, M0BMU and G3YXM. Their may b
Hi John and Jack If you are monitoring the reflector for feedback: Nothing at 22.30, but good strong sigs now at 23.00 ack'ing MM0ALM. John, G4CNN ____________________________________________________
Hi All, Good clear transmission from Jack at 22.00 tonight, but fading out toward end of 10 minute period. About 2Hz down. Nothing seen before 22.00, although there were some suspicious dashes on the
Hi, But don't forget the country code, i.e. replace the zero in brackets by 044 for the UK. John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http:
Hi Doc and guys The ISO standard is Year, Month, Day, which shouldn't confuse either side, unless one is from Mars perhaps. I have started to use this when I can remember, but I still prefer Day, Mon
Hi Rye, Interesting explanation. However to add to the confusion "Jelly" is "Jam" in English and "Jello" is "Jelly", hi! 73, John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a
Hi All, VE1ZZ still readable tonight at 23.00 even through heavy QRN. See new image on my web site: www.g4cnn.f2s.com John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool g
Hi Geri, Couldn't access the page for some reason, but I guess it showed the cats with fur standing on end. It's when the cats catch on fire, you have to look out! I have stood my loading coil in a p
