John I ran a simultanous capture this morning,so this may give some indication for a different period..and I agree signals are pretty strong at this distance..but take a look at this mornings data..
John, I made 3 separate data collection of your simutanous Wolf with COOLEDIT and decoded them and labeled them as set1, set 2, set3.. Seems pretty clear from my end that Wolf 5 is the better but her
I started to take a look around 10:20z or so with QRSS90 and got this brief signal capture and then nothing after that.. de Lloyd W3NF FM19MH Attachment: pacific sig.jpg Description: JPEG image
J Monitored this morning and saw nothing hr in Maryland de Lloyd W3NF -- Original Message -- From: "J. Allen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "LowFER at LW Cafe" <lowfer@l
Scott..I have had similiar results as mentioned by KC3OL.. My miniwhip has performed very good even as good as my LF loop that I used for a couple of years.. I have not noted any intermod problems an
John,Joe I copied this last evening(abt 2100-2200z) ..not really sure all whats happening but will pass this along de Lloyd W3NF Joe, Capture at 1655Z: John A. -- No virus found in this incoming mess
XES good ,a trace of NA tonite de Lloyd W3NF -- Original Message -- From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:02 PM Subject: Re: LF: NA
Wow! I copied absolutely nothing..which seems strange for me since ole Wolf seems to come through generally..but much static last nite..think my antenna is still OK HI!! de Lloyd W3NF -- Original Mes