Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R: Re: ULF/VLF: amateur stair case / carrier transmissions

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: R: Re: ULF/VLF: amateur stair case / carrier transmissions
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:48:20 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1561646901; bh=uVzddVeFf1dsVy1hI+GONOndm85PBnSDipY+0b4cs2g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=UoAC2yjotf/ffn4fA12opWvVDRdC1tQZg5nbkbiN7nPBpyu/S6n9FKot799g1+YRg fqu7jkYv49/mrRofy5kUllTpwo9TqojbEM0EA66yz6PLNVxtgkCsHRh2hIBQhpgPzP j68kZTSO34ljhi6PejLZRPkDrFxW3gnA+pZyryRB4OXZY+bLeqpCYkbjBXaPMPLjXT ZWTTHbgjRE2O/d6UiUig2hAF8+7MwPYNElDs4DbgKOquXq/dEUdE/52POTpDLGEp1M Dr2QDiPKbGOfIwNKS9JP4IfHabyxMasjDkkncarkedNQ8ijipQZmNRK5c3pU0K6RUg b/C5Aw9L3ESsA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Marco,

Yes you are right.
But maybe this is a sign! Someone should buy one and start experimenting, then it would be a funny start of the story.
Will you? ;-)
I'm busy with my wires on the ground...

BTW there was an unannounced transmission of SAQ today. I'm right now producing a wav file from the N-S loop (heavy QRN from the east today) to listen for it...
73, Stefan


Am 27.06.2019 12:19, schrieb [email protected]:
ehm... Roman
Stefan just mistyped drone instead of done ;-)
73 Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 27-giu-2019 11.50
A: <[email protected]>
Ogg: Re: ULF/VLF: amateur stair case / carrier transmissions

Gut Abend Genosse Funkamateur Stefan!

Do not understood exactly - whats model of drone? Quadrocopter?
20 min so little time, of course.
We are discuss about transmit power for copter by wires from the ground, not batteries.
73!
Roman

> Hello Genosse Funkamateur Roman,
>
> I'm sorry, the 'drone' was just a typo. I simply meant 'done' instead.
>
> 73,Stefan
>
> Am 26.06.2019 10:58, schrieb Roman:
>
>> Guten morgen Genosse Funkamateur Stefan!
>>
>> Congrats with your success!
>>
>> Let us to know more details about drone antenna?
>> We are discuss about that way in 2011 on 136.su forum.
>> Very interesting!
>>
>> 73!
>> Roman
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today, some 20 minute long carrier transmissions were drone from JN39WI
>>> again. The main intention was to calibrate my local RDF spectrogram
>>> (still to be done) in the range below 16.4 kHz (JXN) and above 82 Hz
>>> (ZEVS). So that was a amateur radio ULF/VLF staircase somehow, despite
>>> the weak signal strength relative to commercial transmitters.
>>>
>>> It was a hot day! Far> 30 C here. I started early in the morning and
>>> enjoyed the fresh air in the forest.
>>>
>>> The DC resistance of the 1130m ground loop increased to 73.2 Ohm
>>> (measured at 1 A) due to the dry soil. It confirms the dependency shown
>>> in the last year! In 2018 i saw the resistance rising up to 94 Ohm in
>>> late October, then it dropped to 57 Ohm (-40 %) in just 2 months.
>>>
>>> It was interesting to see that the antenna current is much higher at
>>> lower frequencies (always at resonance | the PA output voltage is nearly
>>> constant). This effect was very clearly expressed.
>>>
>>> IF of interest for other stations (having a data storage):
>>>
>>> Frequency/Hz Start time/UTC Antenna current/A
>>> 970.005 2019-06-25_08:36:20,+20m 2.26
>>> 2970.005 2019-06-25_08:13:30,+20m 2.19
>>> 5170.005 2019-06-25_07:51:00,+20m 2.09
>>> 8270.005 2019-06-25_07:23:00,+25m 1.85
>>> end of the official part.
>>>
>>> BTW, since a few days, the VLF RX site at DL0AO has a 3 axis VLF
>>> receiver recording data from a Octo-soundcard and a Raspberry pi 3,
>>> saving data to a 4 TB HDD so there is one more station that won't miss
>>> anything from now on (for example unannounced transmissions by SAQ).
>>>
>>> Some spectrograms may be shown later.
>>>
>>> Evetually there was a problem with the sample rate correction due to the >>> upheating car, which caused a high deviation of the tracked sample rate.
>>> The max allowed range of 10 ppm was left in the end of the experiment
>>> but this was noticed a bit late, maybe.
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
--
73!
Roman, RW3ADB







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>