|Subject:||Re: ELF: Schumann resonance spectrogram|
|From:||Markus Vester <[email protected]>|
|Date:||Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:35:39 +0000 (UTC)|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1560278143; bh=YlM9hNZFrSKxvUDfkq1wvJOm5G/SLXQg4PsOqW5ilzw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=dlpfG7Oqd9K1AjF600ORpZCkXpf9THR99aiZ8+2mAiqG02Igm+is14GKQfJ1KTbbiph6r2X9X7tUI9wYud8yQDnYrOv0Vxvy0X4PV/Hk2MEZfA+01jneAtHkUsK6TupKcp+1VtrqEBDhg4FRJuMf3CJ7Lq7d6l7+EG1cQeDJkBJ9maAhf9zpji9hdOwv93O5GLKqBne9JB29AtQTtkP+2xZqt6cbRjTEHcHss7afdi31ZoaiUYp6QnmDowRBAp9CRMxpLZcki73YFXQOKs+bntZLFwHlKcYvjqN6IFQoQh62k8Vx9kGym4F3YhuZKspFgkJYna5/pUtqHvBXmlMiWw==|
no, we normally don't engage noise blanking on ELF, mostly because it would cause splatter around the strong 50 Hz line.
By the way, the observed maxima don't seem to agee well with nominal Schumann frequencies as published in Wikipedia, based on a sqrt(n*(n+1)) formula. A simple set of equispaced frequencies (1.6+n*6.2) Hz appear to provide a better fit.
Von: DK7FC <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Di, 11. Jun. 2019 12:26
Betreff: ELF: Schumann resonance spectrogram
I see you're displaying a 7th Schumann resonance on the DL0AO grabber site.
Edgar pointed me to the idea to enable "show radio station list" in
SpecLab, which is now done. I added just 6 markers, although a 7th trace
is actually visible here as well, with poor SNR though. This leads me to
the question if a noise blanker with high peak/average (blanking only
strong local bursrs) threshold could be useful to improve the Schumann
SNR. Do you have a NB enabled there?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: ULF/VLF: Tweek resonances - also on 50 Hz harmonics?, DK7FC|
|Next by Date:||Re: ULF/VLF: Tweek resonances - also on 50 Hz harmonics?, Markus Vester|
|Previous by Thread:||LF: DL0AO Grabber problem, Roman|
|Next by Thread:||LF: AWLF Updated 2019-06-16, Alex R7NT|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|