Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
From: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:52:41 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1555692762; bh=GzWkTxb6UeIFpdNmPWGOHkG6NypA4NjF+P3fhsPnKrY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=F5Qukjwm6VumJSEpmzxoDoLoyN3XNBkB0VLOvymQ14CIIPFubvKzRSrJnvV4umkJD ZRvmXtxWst+p4NcnOmVhHgNXtb8OEMTCSZbMatCNXoy8kyFWviocUZbLPI1p5OlMov UyoNc0JZDjMsBdbF07rlswVFkyoMVCyr+DnkkHl4=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AdT2zMF0eYJ7W7wzTfm0Zz9ADiq4/gAAuVJQ
Hi Stefan,

thanks for the explanation.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
>Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 6:25 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>
>Hi Clemens,
>
>Yes, indeed. This is because i am running two identical 
>receivers (using 
>the same LO) with two orthogonal loops into my tree (/p) and then two 
>WSPR instances using the same callsign (DK7FC/p). Sometimes 
>WSPR uploads 
>all two spots and sometimes just one of them (of course 
>sometimes there 
>is a decode at one antenna only). So this is not an anormality.
>
>73, Stefan
>
>
>Am 19.04.2019 17:16, schrieb Clemens Paul:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>>    
>>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik
>>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ.
>>> You know, the complainers ;-)
>>>      
>> There was indeed another multiple decode,albeit on the same 
>frequency.
>>
>> 2019-04-17 20:02      IW4DXW          0.475797        -3     
> 0      JN64bw          0.5     DK7FC/P         JN49ik          563
>> 334
>>   2019-04-17 20:02    IW4DXW          0.475797        +1     
> 0      JN64bw          0.5     DK7FC/P         JN49ik          563
>> 334
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Clemens
>> DL4RAJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:46 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>>>
>>> Hi Markus,
>>>
>>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik
>>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ.
>>> You know, the complainers ;-)
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.04.2019 22:29, schrieb Markus Vester:
>>>
>>>     Hi Clemens,
>>>
>>>     the signal from Ric looks perfectly clean at DL0AO,
>>> indeed a strong signal but no multiple decodes.
>>>
>>>     73, Markus
>>>     
>>>     
>>>     
>>>     -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
>>>     Von: Clemens Paul<[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     An: rsgb_lf_group<[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     Cc: rsgb-lf-group<[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     Verschickt: Mi, 17. Apr. 2019 22:13
>>>     Betreff: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>>>     
>>>     
>>>     Hello,
>>>     
>>>     IW4DXW is booming in here but unfortunately his signal has a
>>>     very poor purity,hence the multiple deoces.
>>>     
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475802  -7  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475787  -7  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475794  0  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475775  -19  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475791  -6  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475772  -20  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8
>>>     2019-04-17 20:02  IW4DXW  0.475760  -24  0  JN64bw  0.5
>>> DL4RAJ  JN68kj  389  8  7
>>>
>>>
>>>     73
>>>
>>>     Clemens
>>>     DL4RAJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source
>>>      
>> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>        
>Virenfrei.>www.avg.com
>>    
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source
>>>      
>> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>        
>>    
>>>
>>>      
>>
>>    
>
>
>---
>Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
>http://www.avg.com
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>