didn't install those tools. I can't remember now... maybe they don't
was much better than WSPR2... even though most WSPR2 listeners were
On 11/14/18 4:09 PM,
[email protected]
wrote:
> Stefan
>
> Vague memories ... the tools, if they still exist, would be on an
old computer that's not so easy to
> resurrect.
>
> Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think
your time might be better spent on
> that mode since there are already many listeners. It would be
interesting to see how far west into
> the US you could be decoded on a good night. Just my opinion ;~) .
>
> Jay W1VD
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DK7FC" <
[email protected]>
> To: <
[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:51 PM
> Subject: LF: WSPR-15
>
>
>> Jay, LF,
>>
>> I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-)
>>
>> You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15.
>> Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX
station ) tried WSPR-8 and even
>> WSPR-30 successfully.
>>
>> Using Markus tools, the slowly transmitted WSPR (with accurate
FSK spacing) was accelerated
>> replayed in the next time slot and then fed to the normal
WSPR-2 decoder, beeing connected to the
>> database.
>>
>> Meanwhile the WSPR-2 decoder performance seems to have much
improved. So, it may be interesting to
>> try the 'old' tool of Markus together with the latest WSPR-2
decoder.
>>
>> What do you think? Do you still have the config files and so
on?
>>
>> Worth a try?
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> PS: 137.620 kHz is right in the WSPR-15 defined slot. I think
this is why my coil is resonant
>> there ;-)