Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:52:31 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fgj15nCMC+tVjMMXgj0EWBjFjH6TS2uCo68NdZwmcqE=; b=Q75Kmgbjm3wGDF2GwhAMCC92I5esUf0DZe9Tga/S2ajVV8HYZsuALJBVTzl59d2G+J wC5UIUhu4t3Hnj/bIS5G+yt26fRI0OF6MLfH9KgXrCFe2yTmogctPpG9u3wXR3e/EWez fvckdOikx8Wp4ToEiBLAmg0z/SkSztj7qWvmKq428S2+j64/6twpzqXdjqZQVDxE9czF KdbsVZTPvuFYpuMmq+oI0T8Xu9AttRXzLqbBCY9tSgbOS9ZNRdCCvZPO+zxsYSzFngeF bWoPTXV7FJH8LNj0s1zlg0JIei55rb7c+5Xt/rUcF6sEsE/+xuSLbK4e1TgPhI6t9IaV VBaQ==
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23QwHkhQT5zZgWAt_RbepF3JV98rNeQ3fJO2YixM=74dGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHAQVWMkJzKviRv6J_D463gTPaa72s+xZFCj_ct8eFSj8nourQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23QwHkhQT5zZgWAt_RbepF3JV98rNeQ3fJO2YixM=74dGw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Andy,

I have already had QRPP JT9 QSOs on 472kHz some years ago.  Want to see how FT8 performs by comparison. FT8 works well on 10m, 6m and 2m.
50Hz BW is fine by me. Yes, I know JT9 should be better. 15 sec periods are helpful.

Still trying to find the correct frequencies for FT8 on 472kHz! Any advice welcomed.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 15:39, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
You would do better with JT9.    It has a narrower signalling bandwidth
Don't jump on the FT8 bandwagon just because everyone else is using it at HF



On 11 September 2018 at 15:21, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
After the success last night on 472kHz WSPR (10mW ERP) with the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground, I may try 472kHz FT8 this evening. 

If you fancy a try please give me a call on FT8. I shall try 472kHz FT8 this evening probably after 1800z. I'll call CQ probably.

73s
Roger G3XBM
JO02dg (near Cambridge)

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Andy Talbot
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend, DK7FC
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:  LF: RE: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, James Cowburn
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]