Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: Ground loop antennas, how to tune best?

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: RE: Ground loop antennas, how to tune best?
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:03:49 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1533225838; bh=Bujtq57bZ3jwWYLouQ81+3FnDLLqfb+Zk57+gKT0xg4=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=F/gTOhJn7KdHdF4aSaWTTyl/wxDKJAGXX6ye+Yk5j+r9dz7v2hpJT7OBbvil0AC/x V9sbClXS8paHD1bJaA98vrOzIrowDCBQd31aRqLNA6B7XQPZcAnRNTmz7S7CRLjINt sp/cq3E9sm9dopFNIJM4rFhaIocMLjn84ZQd2K6MoM4erBwAoBIP9BhVkAXwIjc0M0 PrkMIZkJDEt7qiDkuPzNLjioIQAs90mPwqiZJjKD22eWu8oOV8JDosCOqLzmi/hwJL ma7+mjNVr0nCLpYkhSbeKoVfn4j15TF5zmeN6M6CVioWauQiCzlCOLm7wtVJwLLJ5t noqcpnJTQsflA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQGK+X/mQMWyuRdjsqX4eNmU0jy1AgH6HXhZAdBODi4BxZXZlgFXaCBDAcOIWOUBnYNBKQGxTZhLAYfRXfIBU2fEMwKcsQRKAKPPLBYCLTTnegIjmfQZAfApZLUBvUjkVaRuMong
Hello Stefan,

I wondered if peak voltages or peak currents from your parasitic capacitances 
and parasitic inductances (lab load and/or earth load) could be contributing to 
the current limit, via:
[(a) transistor heating from I/V peaks outside Safe Operating Area (SOA); or 
(b) combination of heating and spectral losses from harmonics caused by 
parasitic-induced peak currents/voltages outside the transistor linear region].
I have such effects in my VLF large-loop transmitters [but I usually operate 
Class D, which is more sensitive to parasitic (out-of-phase, out-of-SOA) peaks].

If the above applies, one solution might be to characterize the transformer and 
load with a swept-sine (or impulse) signal, and then compensate with lumped L's 
and C's; but I have not done that with large VLF earth-loops or with large VLF 
buried copper-wire loops because I suspect that some of the parasitic L/C 
effects that I have seen with oscilloscope connected to the PA and matching 
network in those cases might be from distributed capacitances and 3-D 
distributed inductances in the earth; and compensation might therefore be 
difficult.

Whether or not the above applies, I wondered if swamping parasitic-L/C-induced 
I/V peaks at the PA output with a lower-impedance PA (and perhaps some parallel 
resistance) might keep the PA transistors in their SOA, and enable 90% 
efficient operation closer to your goal of ~ 50W PA power. Using a 500W linear 
PA to provide 50W (at 90% efficiency) would be expensive, and inexpensive Class 
D is more susceptible to I/V peaks, but I thought I would mention this 
possibility just in case.

Also guessing that you had previously rejected the concept of lower-impedance 
PA-output because SWAP is prohibitive for your remote application; so I'm 
hoping that you or another can identify a limiting element that can be 
compensated. 

At the moment I am at $3/watt to address my similar-sounding issue using 
phase-angle-robust 5-milliohm PAs, but this is beyond my hobby budget for the 
larger earth loops and buried loops, so I've been settling for lower power into 
the larger VLF loops. The $3/watt phase-angle-robust PAs can be paralleled, 
which will eventually be helpful if the problem can be reduced to average phase 
angles (at the PA output) less than 30 degrees, beyond which the VA to watt 
ratio at $3/VA would be hard to justify.   

I think I will characterize a large buried VLF loop anyway; prior oscilloscope 
measurements with large buried VLF loops seemed to suggest a relatively simple 
L/C-earth-network model; it would be nice to know if this is the case, even if 
it doesn’t provide an immediate solution for PA SWAP problems with VLF earth 
loops. Perhaps such a model will show that earth-distributed L and C are a 
limiting factor at VLF; in which case earth-distributed-C might be less of a 
problem at 970 Hz. If distributed reactance is primarily from L or C and not 
both, it could perhaps be compensated at the PA. Perhaps your 970 Hz test will 
provide a clue.   

Best compliments on your latest series of fascinating experiments.  

73,

Jim AA5BW   


    

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: VLF:Ground loop antennas, how to tune best?

Hi all,

Today i played a bit with my linear VLF/ULF PA, some output transformers, a 50 
Ohm dummy load and a 3 mH air cored coil (a smal one, from LF). I thought this 
could represent the ground loop antenna during tests in the shack.

With the switchable C-network, i managed to tune to resonance between
8.27 kHz down to 0.97 kHz. A usual R-L-C network. The goal  was to proove that 
the system can tune to and run 1 A antenna current on each of the desired 
frequencies.

However, i did not manage to reach more than 500 mA 'antenna' current. 
Above, there appeared significant distortions / harmonics. Why?
When i connect the dummy load directly to the output transformer (just R 
instead of RLC), i can easily tune to 1 A 'antenna' current and the sine wave 
almost looks perfectly. So it cannot be an issue of a saturating transformer. 
Also the coil cannot saturate.
So, where are the distortions coming from?
The main component of the overlayed distortion voltage is maybe 10x higher in 
frequency.

BTW in the first test with the 900m ground loop the voltage showed some 
distortions as well and i wondered how it comes from. Then i thought it has to 
do with saturation and a far-from-ideal matching of the PA output impedance...

Back to the test in the shack:
Eventually there are further resonance frequencies, coming from the stray 
inductance of the transformer and the 'internal' capacity of the coil.

Now if this can happen with discrete elements in the shack, it can happen on 
the ground loop anyway! This antenna will certainly have an interesting 
frequency response, TX-wise.

So my thought is: Maybe it is even better not to series resonate the loop but 
to parallel resonate it! This will lead to a higher feed point impedance, which 
will be frequency dependent, so it is a more complex thing. But the parallel C 
should help to avoid transmitting on harmonics.

Or, i could series resonate the antenna on the frequency of interest and then 
add a parallel resonated LC circuit. This is easier to do because the parallel 
LC can be tuned before connecting the antenna. Then the antenna can be 
connected...
Or, even something like a T-filter (2 series L and one parallel C) but that 
will be complex to align when sitting in the car which is full of electronis 
stuff anyway... Also it is a challenge on ULF :-)

And certainly it helps to minimise the stray reactances, e.g. by using just as 
less primary turns on the output transformer as possible. But then it is not 
usable on all frequencies and will need taps on the primary and secondary side.

Any ideas / comments? :-)

73, Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>