Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test
From:	Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:16:35 +0000
Accept-language:	en-US
Authentication-results:	spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=[email protected];
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Ht+6YcNRGUCUNDezHVUtNQuBxjDyLS6RUssd/w5MgaU=; b=b/a5K3C+szYrcMwkbxkV7fMd72DJCc2HRWsvRv3iNnd+n3lxUCcGIh/5Qohx687UsgwCOiRGuDmTgyuAN1x8FqD/NL9cRRa/DIziuEq7q4ETuYAZqyGpT/FnMPUOW3v2w/7fzl4w0ohn4z6bMPW9mLiTyF+IHGT5ckV5A7wTdcE5s7sU+U5fHFTR97dxinyLw1+VaCnDdvJChV4q7UjS5mBRT4/L2T4CQM2HkrxGrlE2ePXJQ6P525h7YukN1kIoBIpix3xQkancYjoMApTk9m9dzTajHMDs9XObeOwOS65xEdky0Ak86YLILAO72+5GHVXPYyOFm3tkZdpKYGZSew==
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AQHUHS2roWsqS4FZfk+81cjWbsiSUqSSQe+AgAAHfhs=
Thread-topic:	R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test

I can confirn the ruggedness too - close thunderstorm strikes using the pa0rdt 
probe in Ghana, Singapore, Namibia, Malaysia, Fiji,  Indonesia and China etc 
all failed to destroy. Only one time the device failed was a very very close 
strike on the same tree as the probe was stationed Oklahoma!

Laurence

> On Jul 16, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Marco,
> 
> The J310 is a sturdy device.
> In a strong RF field the gate starts to conduct and the gate voltage does not 
> rise any higher.
> The device protects itself so to speak.
> 
> Due to the small size of the 'PCB-antenna' of 30 x 40 mm, voltage build up 
> due to nearby 
> thunderstorms is low compared to e.g. a 1 meter long whip antenna. Hence 
> reports of defunct 
> antennas due to lightning are rare.
> 
> The most common cause of failure is accidentally sending 100 W RF or more up 
> the feed-line! 
> 
> 73,
> Roelof, pa0rdt
> 
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, [email protected] Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Roelof Bakker Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Laurence KL7 L <= Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Roman R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, [email protected]

Previous by Date:	Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Roelof Bakker
Next by Date:	Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG
Previous by Thread:	Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Roelof Bakker
Next by Thread:	Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, Roman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]