Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test
From: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:16:35 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=[email protected];
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Ht+6YcNRGUCUNDezHVUtNQuBxjDyLS6RUssd/w5MgaU=; b=b/a5K3C+szYrcMwkbxkV7fMd72DJCc2HRWsvRv3iNnd+n3lxUCcGIh/5Qohx687UsgwCOiRGuDmTgyuAN1x8FqD/NL9cRRa/DIziuEq7q4ETuYAZqyGpT/FnMPUOW3v2w/7fzl4w0ohn4z6bMPW9mLiTyF+IHGT5ckV5A7wTdcE5s7sU+U5fHFTR97dxinyLw1+VaCnDdvJChV4q7UjS5mBRT4/L2T4CQM2HkrxGrlE2ePXJQ6P525h7YukN1kIoBIpix3xQkancYjoMApTk9m9dzTajHMDs9XObeOwOS65xEdky0Ak86YLILAO72+5GHVXPYyOFm3tkZdpKYGZSew==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHUHS2roWsqS4FZfk+81cjWbsiSUqSSQe+AgAAHfhs=
Thread-topic: R: Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test
I can confirn the ruggedness too - close thunderstorm strikes using the pa0rdt 
probe in Ghana, Singapore, Namibia, Malaysia, Fiji,  Indonesia and China etc 
all failed to destroy. Only one time the device failed was a very very close 
strike on the same tree as the probe was stationed Oklahoma!


> On Jul 16, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Marco,
> The J310 is a sturdy device.
> In a strong RF field the gate starts to conduct and the gate voltage does not 
> rise any higher.
> The device protects itself so to speak.
> Due to the small size of the 'PCB-antenna' of 30 x 40 mm, voltage build up 
> due to nearby 
> thunderstorms is low compared to e.g. a 1 meter long whip antenna. Hence 
> reports of defunct 
> antennas due to lightning are rare.
> The most common cause of failure is accidentally sending 100 W RF or more up 
> the feed-line! 
> 73,
> Roelof, pa0rdt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>