| To: | LineOne <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz |
| From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Jul 2018 22:48:05 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sgpVU1ZT9YVQm117MvdXujvsLqd7gMthBFa5o/EVW/4=; b=mb2y6RavWjCmwxYrO4cFnVjXm/hjkPKXjWcq/QAXzzzESe1n1NANU04MQ4iQkvfHF2 qYNnsQwA+HsufE8jYXt0+6MOQweN41dqGtmwmYlB1hZiLnI5MGgyfOef+Hrm0FhOSAPK DMd1YB6hfQFjQixktE24yNeLzv5/Gd1VsGV+Q+OWaTpuaPAQLsfziNHUG9PAIWXNozpp +cFieFqzVtXNlGulZFPPiMhT8UrEoy5mJsiJKuiT0jPKUEb0VNNc2IcfvzFHO36Acmhe SP5x54DbViS5pOVhscATHLdJbwnQfDfjgbsGJRZwkTx2fIcR8KaTUHyEVlTP1rGbhKyv 4ykQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <CANi3vvs+9NwNp6sAKbvkRFYsUS_q5jjaBb6xGG0Z9pih4LALAg@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAHAQVWMte_9GEF90SMu09atqVUWzKHh-Wt+cxjkHH+AcR4ggYQ@mail.gmail.com> <95F978822451403DBC46B4D8DE826DF3@Clemens0811> <CAHAQVWNyPNOf-eY1GtAcQ+b0HKu+mv=DdaZStS8vWM9LZVfPRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ4oo942D_pYYrBXbcLGhVtbBMWQaYTrTcLZQ+ak3BU5LAxtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANi3vvs+9NwNp6sAKbvkRFYsUS_q5jjaBb6xGG0Z9pih4LALAg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
At that price, and that PA efficiency (15 amps at 13.8V for 50W out - very low) you'd have thought they could have dual-banded it, 137kHz and 475kHz A broadband linear PA, 100 - 500kHz is hardly rocket science Andy On 6 July 2018 at 22:15, M0FMT <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz, M0FMT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz, N1BUG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz, M0FMT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz, N1BUG |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |