Re: LF: RE: Summer 630m

[Tobias DG3LV <DG3LV@gmx.net>]

 Hi Luis !

> > May be you are using WSJT-X? It is giving higer signal reports than WSPR-X
> > I’m getting +18dB from my monitor at 7Km with WSPR-X and +30dB with WSJT-X
> > So, a +11 would be -1 with WSPR-X.
This was an issue of older WSJT-X software versions (1.7 ??), the 
current version WSJT-X 1.9.1 does not have that problem. It arose from 
the use of smaller (than 2500Hz) IF-filters. This is no longer a 
problem. I'm using 250 Hz Filters for WSPR and WSJT-X 1.9.1 works well.
73 de dg3lv Tobias

Am 05.07.2018 um 10:59 schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
> Thank you David
>
> May be you are using WSJT-X? It is giving higer signal reports than WSPR-X
>
> I’m getting +18dB from my monitor at 7Km with WSPR-X and +30dB with WSJT-X
>
> So, a +11 would be -1 with WSPR-X. Not bad anyway
>
> Indeed the 80m vertical (Kiteless) antenna with only 80W PA has an 
> amazing performace and low radiation angle
> Not a Tesla stuff but a real option for those living in flats. Building 
> height used as part of the antenna
> It’s very common in EA to live in 6 to 12 floors height buildings, which 
> gives you up to 25m for free, plus the height
> of the pole to support the high voltage section (after coil) of the 
> antenna. But people think they have to recreate a
> groung plane at the roof, which is not the way to go
>
> 73 de Luis
>
> EA5DOM
>
> *De:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *En nombre de *David Bowman
> *Enviado el:* jueves, 05 de julio de 2018 10:22
> *Para:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
> *Asunto:* LF: Summer 630m
>
> Big WSPR signal from Luis EA5DOM overnight.
>
> Peaked at +11dB at 03.00 UTC   -  1596km
>
> David G0MRF