LF: SAQ 17.2 kHz in CT

To:	"([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: SAQ 17.2 kHz in CT
From:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2018 22:44:48 -0400
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1530499490; bh=AxyxuC3yd/fkEvWq2peZYOHz0XpvJKFP5J0FeO92yrg=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID; b=GmhUGgKezaPxmppQDRtrF50upfoJZ2KtvGuTw7xxXeLcKAkJA1m7NFKT32tiiwazT jBbYHyXIjlSW7s8vesvJ7FSyDQgaM0GYdR7+ug73weFu8s9YAuGLfe0PjQ5J6b45EG ysNfYf6CxyD9P6nhbpg26OzEaYXTT5CiocIO0ZbOznVURvEf2xsNHuDki8LJK7cpEq G4GD9BdbzSnZZv2g9HtHIWqVtiKLlTB6QnlhjOGRVv64IaJkPu+CDpQHXhRQsenNhI l3ZOhBuZca84vnToHKxhnhDMLKBTXLyMC4IvEB+CKN2fxPwPeeqiZL2L3qxQSVAect nw9OFtANkwHBw==
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	OEClassic/2.7 (Win7; P; 2017-02-12)

SAQ enthusiasts

Copy of the 0845z transmission was poor due to high QRN levels. Copy at 1045z and 1245z was much improved due to lower QRN levels ... a slight edge going to the 1045 transmission. Even with the lower QRN the overall readability was about average for SAQ based on many years listening to their signal. A short .mp3 of the test / tune and message is available at www.w1vd.com/SAQ070118.mp3 .

Running the usual setup: modified Amrad e probe > LNA > Delta 44 > SpectrumLab.

Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/3

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: SAQ 17.2 kHz in CT, [email protected] <= LF: SAQ on 17.2 kHz, Groups_M0WWA

Previous by Date:	LF: 472kHz WSPR RX, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Date:	RE: VLF/ULF: Improved grabber from the tree..., VIGILANT Luis Fernández
Previous by Thread:	LF: 472kHz WSPR RX, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Thread:	LF: SAQ on 17.2 kHz, Groups_M0WWA
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]