Re: LF: Re: LF: Mar 31 – Apr 1 Best QRB/reports

[Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>]

Thanks Alex! Well I would probably mention (carrier) Eb/N0, and also the number of characters transferred. In my opinion showing rank is not as important, as strong decodes with positive EbN0 are usually anyway on the top of the list (rank 0).

Best 73,
Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: jrusgrove <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mo, 2. Apr 2018 4:00
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: LF: Mar 31 – Apr 1 Best QRB/reports

Alex

 

Thanks for considering adding EbNaut to your list! The most important parameter is that there was a decode at all ... Rank and EbN0 of the reception would be a nice addition but not absolutely necessary. Others may want to chime in with their opinions.

 

Jay W1VD

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Alex R7NT <r7nt.73@gmail.com>

Reply-To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

Sent: 4/1/2018 2:01:10 PM

Subject: LF: Re: LF: Mar 31 – Apr 1 Best QRB/reports

---

Jay,

this is an excellent remark !

See page http://136.su/index.php/topic,18.msg21001.html#msg21001

I do not know what are the correct parameters for EbNaut to specify, but I open the green light for EbNaut :)

see http://136.73.ru/h_qso/qso.htm  also

73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru

2018-04-01 20:10 GMT+03:00 jrusgrove@comcast.net <jrusgrove@comcast.net>:

Alex

 

Wonder if you're planning to include EbNaut? There have been a few long distance receptions the past few days.

 

Jay W1VD