To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: QSO MF/630 |
From: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2018 06:22:39 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <91B001566F0A442D95AC7AEA56FB7F73@mal> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Were the condx superior or just average? I.e., can we expect similar or even better SNRs from the far signals? Hi Stefan, Thanks for the report !Conditions were not superior. I have seen better conditions several times this season. QSB was a powerful enemy and peak signal levels were down a few dB from the best nights. I will write more about last night and continuing activity in a few moments. 73, Paul N1BUG FN55mf |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: QSO MF/630, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] MF JT9 NOW, jcraig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: QSO MF/630, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | LF: JT9 630m 8th Feb, Rolf Torvik |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |