To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:09:45 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DzWG81hsKbSetSJJ1zvgjiTslbhKlqJD04Ka+ADxnPo=; b=XXrYqzbVC7ggr8oJDR0mYofNYa +2qX2u+PbPn/gjtcSzuPP9TDf/mq3L3/pU1krGzOX43UthG4qT2L6/nMNMH7Fp1qPrq0mjzJsNDHn bf+RXjzLuMupmzIkFMmMiDo/wV7yheFsaHsCDpV1+ec1M0PfdWWonVAgIe9tZ6pWiecc=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAF572@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
New H-field rx is coming along well. Design changes are completed - it has a lower system noise, wider bandwidth, significantly lower common mode response, and a much better line driver. Like the new E-field rx, it also has a built-in calibration port. Currently testing the design changes on breadboard and it performs just as per the Spice model, except for a higher than expected system noise. Should be just below 0.1fT in 1Hz but I'm measuring 0.46 fT. Maybe this specimen of LT1028 is a bit noisier than others? It's my last one but I've got more arriving hopefully today. I'll pick the best two. Even with this mysterious extra system noise, it's still 20dB below the natural noise floor after sferic blanking. Apart from that it is working perfectly, just as per design and looks very good at 137 kHz too. Hopefully will be able to start the cutting and drilling and filing and soldering this week. That's my least favourite part of the job. What I won't discover until it's finished and installed, is whether it actually cures the excess noise at 8kHz and 5kHz that we've seen lately. I haven't been able to identify the cause of the relatively (compared to E-field) poor S/N on the existing rx. Hopefully it is a low level of intermod in the line driver. If so the new rx will not suffer that problem and we'll see another step improvement in the 8270 spectrogram. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver, jcraig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |