Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: Using resonance effects of earth-ionosphere for radio experimen

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: Using resonance effects of earth-ionosphere for radio experiments
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:05:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi John,

Thank you.
The large image is well known meanwhile but i did see the other one so far. Where did you take it from and are there more informations? What means ||Tn| ? I guess n is the numer of hops. But T = Tesla? Not really. It should be |B(n)|. So maybe something else. But it would make sense that is is something that has to do with the field strength. Odd... Assuming it is actually the fieldstrength, then 1 kHz looks most interesting again. I need to continue to work in that range!!

73, Stefan

Am 23.10.2017 14:21, schrieb John Fisher:
Hi Stefan,

Attached re two graphs on this subject you might find interesting.

73 John VA3VVV



--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10/23/17, DK7FC<[email protected]>  wrote:

  Subject: VLF: Using resonance effects of earth-ionosphere for radio 
experiments
  To: [email protected]
  Received: Monday, October 23, 2017, 7:15 AM

  Paul, Markus, VLF,

  Some days ago there have been
  local thunderstorms near DL0AO in JN59.
  Two
  images in attachemnt.
  The distance is about
  225 km. The thunderstorms were on a small spot only.

  The sferics are clearly
  pronounced with an SNR increase of 10 dB and
  more, quite a sharp peak/trace. That's not
  a new observation but now we
  are operating
  just in that frequency range!
  The effect
  seems to appear in integer multiples of about 1.7 kHz, which

  is roughly a wavelength of a 180 km, and
  the earth-ionosphere height is
  just
  lambda/2.

  It would be most
  interesting to see how a similar spectrogram looks from
  Pauls site (time and date given in the images).
  Is the effect still
  there in 881 km? How
  strong is it expressed. Are the frequencies the same?
  If so, we should try to find that region of
  enhanced propagation, by
  using a 2-tone or
  3-tone carrier signal. No problem to provide that from
  here.

  The
  effect is less expressed on 3.4 kHz in this event. Recently
  we
  discussed about a geometric single-hop
  path difference between DK7FC and
  DL0AO
  (Markus calculated 63.3 km difference between groundwave and

  skywave). 5.17 is at a 1.09 lambda
  difference on that path, so
  groundwave and
  skywave will add constructively. The 3rd order trace of
  the sferic resonance effect is also at 5.1
  kHz!
  3.4 kHz, or the 88.2 km wave, is then
  at 1.4 lambda difference, so
  skyway and
  groundwave do not add so constructive. Maybe this explains

  the lower expressed resonance effect?

  It looks like there can be SNR
  difference of several dB when changing
  the
  frequency by just a few 10 Hz, at least arround 5.1 kHz and
  on the
  path to DL0AO. We should try to
  check that!

  Could there be
  a frequency with an advantage on the way to RN3AUS? On a
  2000 km path the effects will be less
  expressed. But worth to think about...

  73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>