Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx
From:	DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 13 May 2017 18:38:40 +0200
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hi Luis,

Try the one in the attachment.
Note that the frequency marker could cover a narrow peak...

73, Stefan

Am 13.05.2017 11:43, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:

Thank you Stefan

Waiting for your config file ;-)

73 de Luis

EA5DOM

El 12 may. 2017 8:43 p. m., DK7FC <[email protected]> escribió:

Hi Luis,

I just made some cosmetics, no changes in the signal path.
It looks better than expected now. Worth to try a first test in 47 uHz.

I will send you a usr file for 47 uHz, 8.27 for the grabber. OK?

73, Stefan

Am 12.05.2017 17:45, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:

Thank you Stefan

The SL instance is updated with the modified USR file. Non stopped, so you can see the difference

https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html

73 de Luis

EA5DOM

VLF_Soundcard_32K_47uHz.zip
Description: application/compressed

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx, VIGILANT Luis Fernández Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx, DK7FC <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig
Next by Date:	Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx, VIGILANT Luis Fernández
Next by Thread:	LF: Combining LF amps revisited, Chris Wilson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]