Hello Stefan.

 

Some comments :

 

Here it keep in memory the last mode and band used when I start... I have not your problem. I just chek all the menus, but I do not find anything about that. So ???

Yes The WSPR-15 is not yet implemented, that is perhaps the reason why this version it is not official...

The JT9 and JT65 are working very well

I Think also the docode is faster, the Deep option in the decode menu is fine, it can decode 2 signals very close in frequencies and a bit better in S/N reports (but I think no more sensitive).

I did not tried to open several instances of the V1.7.0 here. Often I open one XSJT-X v 1.7.0 for WSPR2, one v 0.8 r3058 for WSPR15 and one for OPERA. That all.

 

Best Luck and 73 Stefan.

@++ Andy.

 

Hello Andy / F6CNI,

Thank you for pointing me to WSJT-X v1.7.0-devel, it actually performs better than my old WSPR-X v0.9 r3058, especially when strong and weak signals are present in the same time slot! It also shows a 2 dB better SNR (sometimes) but i don't (still) know if it is 2 dB more sensitive. Also it decodes faster.
I will use it from now on.
Unfortunately WSPR-15 is not supported in that mode so i will use the older version for that.
Why does the program not save the band? After a restart it always starts on 2m... But that's a minor problem...
I will see if it runs for weeks without crashing, an important parameter!

How is it possible to run 2 or multiple instances? Do i need 2 installations?

73, Stefan


Am 09.09.2016 11:17, schrieb DK7FC:

I think it has to do with different software versions!?

imestamp	Call	MHz	SNR	Drift	Grid	Pwr	Reporter	RGrid	km	az
2016-09-03 09:04	F/DK7FC	0.475681	+38	0	JN29od	1	F6CNI	JN19qb	134	267

I'm still using WSPR-X v0.0 r3058 here. Newer versions performed worse for some reasons. This version does not produce SNRs better than +15 dB if i remember correctly.

Another thing may be that someone could use e.g. a 250 Hz wide filter instead of the reference filter bandwidth of 2500 Hz (SSB), which then produces wrong ("improved") reports.

73, Stefan


Am 09.09.2016 10:13, schrieb Max IK0VVE:

Could someone explain this?
 
2016-09-08 19:42  IK0VVE  0.475682 +17  0  JN61km  0.05  F6CNI  JN19qb  1119  322
2016-09-08 19:26  IK0VVE  0.475682  +1  0  JN61km  0.05  F6CNI  JN19qb  1119  322 
2016-09-08 19:10  IK0VVE  0.475682  -1  0  JN61km  0.05  F6CNI  JN19qb  1119  322
2016-09-08 18:54  IK0VVE  0.475682  -6  0  JN61km  0.05  F6CNI  JN19qb  1119  322

If I listen my signal with my RX antenna 5 meters far from TX antenna my SNR is maximum +13 db, also for IZ0GIF that is about 4 km far from me.
Probably Andy has an exceptional receiving system but +17 to more than 1000 km is a great SNR I thing, HI.

After some minute great reports again:

2016-09-08 19:46	DH5RAE	0.475755	+14	1	JN68qv	0.5	F6CNI	JN19qb	730	275
2016-09-08 19:46	PA3ABK/2	0.475740	+19	0	JO21it	0.5	F6CNI	JN19qb	320	198

 
73, Max IK0VVE 

______________________________

 

...here some of my HAM Radio projects...

SkyGeM Rotator

AntennaDinamica

RCR-DX

www.ik0vve.net