Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 05:16:54 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1462612615; bh=FOuXrsoVGIosQLXfSWUKjjJog6vgGNchhE0ZFgaC/mw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GaGF96jFCTd7CD9/PC+MyY4xSdTH12B32nDt8N2mgg/yggbpH7wMhf7Nc4pi3h0qp osLeXqF+oY/tmGY3DtAbbIEXREdubgMI1B0DqaQh4ZjS4PUORhSwmYksF8Zkd+oftc V6NAswQ0mW64QB6ftMjV6fCKPhfQwEtqDYXzMZw8=
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thanks Stefan for the frequency change to 6.48 kHz. It did help, but unfortunately the level of QRM happened to have increased dramatically since Friday morning.
 
Reviewing stored vlf_wide captures reveals that the "noise strip" above 6 kHz shows significant long-term variability: After being fairly strong during until April 22 19:20 UT, there was a relatively quiet period which ended suddenly May 6, 0:40 UT. I do not know what is causing these variations, but I suspect different types of equipment are being used at the railway yard. There are also intense 33.4 Hz spaced lines of similar type around 3 kHz. Maybe we should all lobby for the return of coal-fired steam engines, which were clean (in that sense) :~(  
 
So my 6.48 kHz grabber is currently pretty useless. Stefan says I need a remote receiver, say 20 km from here. Or maybe I should rather consider moving to a different QTH?
 
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)
 


 
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Fr, 6 Mai 2016 9:26 am
Betreff: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

No chance to see anything on 6470 Hz here due to heavy railway QRM. I noticed that the unstable lines seem to be concentrated on odd multiples of 16.70 Hz. Going 8 to 10 Hz up (e.g. to 6480 Hz) would place the signal in a QRM minimum, gaining at least 5 dB on average.
 
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
  

Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz


Stefan,

Your 200mA carrier comes through well here at 6.47 kHz, nice
signal at 0.14 fT during the night.  Daytime is 0.04 fT or
below and might be a bit of a struggle.

I don't need any more carrier.  From the raw recording I can
optimise filters and blankers and look at most of the diurnal.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Markus Vester <=