Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: EA in LF soon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: EA in LF soon
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:39 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]cal>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]cal> <[email protected]cal>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Luis,

My congratulations! Your first step on the 2200m band. It is very nice! During my active time on LF (2003...2004, 2009...today) i didn't see a Spanish station on the band.

Once i can see you in O-copy in QRSS-3 on my grabber, i will come back to make a QSO!

Ah, i think i need to update my callsloc.txt list for OPDS-32! I bet there would have been more decodes. You are in IM98WN, right?

73, Stefan

PS: Think about some QRSS-60 on 136.172 +- 3 Hz :-)



Am 13.04.2016 08:23, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
Hi LF

First test with 100mW from U3

Iban EB3FRN decoded it in Opera Dynamic at sunrise

05:02    136 EA5DOM de EB3FRN Op32 Deep Search 297 km -42 dB in Montbrio 1499,9 Hz

Still a lot of room for improvements, but looks like the antenna performance is as good as MF

73 de Luis
EA5DOM


De: [email protected] [[email protected]] en nombre de VIGILANT Luis Fernández [[email protected]]
Enviado: martes, 12 de abril de 2016 14:38
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: RE: LF: EA in LF soon

Hi Stefan
 
Yet another convincing argument:
 
As isolated coil, it can be covered with a bigger buck to get a step into VLF  ;-)
 
73 de Luis
EA5DOM


De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de DK7FC
Enviado el: martes, 12 de abril de 2016 13:14
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: LF: EA in LF soon

Hi Luis,

Am 11.04.2016 19:02, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
I prefer to set it appart. It is a truncated cone, so would have a natural tendence to "unwind" just by gravity
In the hot summer I would surely find the cable messed down at the base of the pipe :-)

That's a real argument!

73, Stefan
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>