Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:00:32 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv: Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Rik,

You are right. I will wait a bit longer. But short tests can be done from now on :-)

73, Stefan

Am 01.04.2016 15:49, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Hi Stefan,


"Now i can continue with real transmissions :-)"


hmmm, shouldn't you be listening for a possible reply for at least a couple of weeks?

Calling CQ and not listen for a reply would be rude ...


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens DK7FC [[email protected]]
Verzonden: vrijdag 1 april 2016 15:32
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: RE: CQ QRSS-60000 on VLF

Rik, VLF,

OK, you were right. The transmission is finished. Sometimes it was a hard time to keep me disciplined to finish the local test because i wanted to do other things :-)
Two spectrograms attached.
I bet it is the slowest CQ call ever!?
Although it't just a local test. A single power loss or hang-up of the TX-PC would have messed up the message...
Two different PCs were used, both running SpecLab. The RX instance was 10kHz-disciplined, the TX instance was 1pps-disciplined.

Now i can continue with real transmissions :-)

73, Stefan

PS: Not an 1st April choke
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>