Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

AW: LF: Ebnaut 477.7 kHz

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: AW: LF: Ebnaut 477.7 kHz
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:53:00 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1454363582; bh=L/oXyubCF4N/PpUr8ODYZvKs7uPzpDzVH332qW0/oAk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1S8tMG8kIxkNQbr+rewqY4sdzz36A/Zj/FJXa2CgX1/HeD/Ps8udhBHYbWXR78jse 8ZfUwAkxFbUHGLPGZyTIPdIG4Skb14bHQjxEJNAtvTnEtYczMUAbHNWOS9f4a3JJwY w+H02PPDCm/a7fMWYLfftj3xYl+6KC7nRi/3oEKI=
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Joe wrote:

> 75 chars [4]K19A 1936 symbols 387.2 seconds 10 watts continuous carrier unless the FET fries!

 

… yes Joe, 10 chars and 75 watts might have done it (just ;-)

 

Suggestion: 8K19A, 10 characters, 1 second symbols, 752 seconds total. If possible, try to use above 100 W as some margin for QSB will probably be needed.

 

Listening now…

 

Best 73,

Markus

 


Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Februar 2016 22:28
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: LF: Ebnaut 477.7 kHz

 

Thanks Markus and Roelof for the reports.

 

I'm guessing a slower bit rate and more power might help.

Please feel free to make a suggestion and we'll try again

tonight.

 

73

Joe VO1NA

 

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Markus Vester wrote:

 

Got some pieces of carrier in the spectrogram, up to about 10 dB SNR in 1 mHz. Considering the carrier duty cycle (8.5 out of 15 minutes), that would have been about +15 dB in a mHz for a pure carrier, or -15 dB EbN0 at 1.1 bit/s net data rate - no chance for a decode here.

 

Best 73,

Markus  (DF6NM)

 

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>