Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz
From:	John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:22:49 -0500
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

Mike,

Yes, you were there! Had bits and pieces of your signal starting withthe 0300 ID - caught the "V". Then the 0400 ID was almost complete,excepting only the "V". See below:


John Andrews, W1TAG
FN42ch

XDV20Jan16.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: I mean 136.172kHz, Mike Dennison Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz, F1AFJ Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz, John Andrews <= LF: 9H1ES MF CW, DK7FC Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz, Mike Dennison Message not available Message not available Message not available Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation, DK7FC Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation, Alan Melia Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation, Michael Sapp Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation, VIGILANT Luis Fernández Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation, DK7FC

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 8270Hz/SQ5BPF, Paul Nicholson
Next by Date:	LF: 9H1ES MF CW, DK7FC
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: I mean 136.172kHz, F1AFJ
Next by Thread:	LF: 9H1ES MF CW, DK7FC
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]