To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: MF: "Double-with" JT9 ? |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:17:57 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1453148278; bh=etiCDzFbHdMsLnQBxV1jj6ek5OdnmwhCbas7yIbuVJw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U2PSiPt2WlTJTLt2KsQV8bfDTafiQ3rCLZeyUgrvK3XUMajpMEIyH1YnOU7iUojh6 Zx2qLnH4+qtQeiDthJlQqpRdY6S8zCU/5Crohdu112NaHTQCD3KXQQ36ja26NnDkBP O9LJTHROAzIy1XP3O598e3XOvwItnUngKZb8dmgY= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
...yes I saw it too. The WSJT-X spectogram showed nine equispaced lines with distinct little gaps between them, last time at 19:12 on 1373 Hz, in between CQ blocks from DK7FC. Then at 19:14, Stefan was called by LA3EQ and they conducted a QSO.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
Von: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo, 18 Jan 2016 8:23 pm Betreff: Re: LF: RE: MF: "Double-with" JT9 ? Hi Rik,
My initial thought, too, but the spacing between the tones was also apparently larger than usual. And each of the tones had exactly the same strength, which may happen by conincidence but it's quite rare. I'm not sure if two equally strong stations overlapping partly wouldn't still get a decode every now an then. At least in WSPR-X they would. Cheers, Wolf . Am 18.01.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Rik Strobbe:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: JT9 last night, Wolfgang Büscher |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Opera decode, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: MF: "Double-with" JT9 ?, Wolfgang Büscher |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: "Double-with" JT9 ?, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |