To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR at 4xf from a Raspberry Pi |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:46:32 +0200 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eiOuy8DLhFOmp6JxHlSwuYWJFBXo8RO1e5jMTwobDmc=; b=Y+gntp8bZN/FPf2uofOhCCWXJpcaQ3jp1hl6oDJQeypCDO4W7/aarYMzeyUADf1HHJ HBSyJmqA+VJ47FJ/rhtVC1SBEU1FEFZem8hfoHtelK8xSaxMXP+D5D5OS33WXm8v9ghC Us4kWFjkKb2Cwg3PI8VzG1MASA9VcmXkoAdtcpOvxQQ6EM2PDgkNONX84fV1a6BXUYhq xi3bhAaMqtBQpG/OCD6NGD5LyqIOYqXZXDhzCcmB7UILTXFV9MbIwbnJyuklw+LrvRlO sDgqTtk6KFZ8OG+w2MGcAFaOPivyRf9l3f663yeyZO711TYwpG0jyUxKF9jSbfxxY9w/ pzag== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <4698D0522AFD45F896A41F2D16A2D831@AGB> <BC1061758A4D4230AA9719C22735EBF4@gnat> <19EEF7A6DD30462FA6ACC0F015DC9F52@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234F1A25@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <520562D5C7694FF69C20E595E00B793D@F6CNIToshiba> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Joe, Am 01.04.2015 00:42, schrieb [email protected]: Hi Stefan, That's very clever. It seems the code is quite complex; can you explain how it generates a carrier to someone who is an ungifted programmer? Not really. There are some key-words that i know, like 'fractional divider'... but i don't understand the code. But that isn't necessary for the modification i wanted to realise. Yes, it would not work. I've also tested a similar program to drive a LED at high frequencies. The output-f is unstable, high jitter...My level is not much better than this: def beep13(t2): i=0 while i<500*t2: i+=1 GPIO.output(13,1) #GPIO.HIGH) time.sleep(0.001) GPIO.output(13,0) #GPIO.LOW) time.sleep(0.001) return I used this piece of python as a 500 Hz side tone for a pi keyer but doubt it will work at 479 kHz. If you want to use the WSPR function, you just need to read the informations on the links i recently sent. 2 weeks ago i have been in the same situation ;-) 73, Stefan 73 and thanks for the reports on your progress. Joe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 137.7781, Laurence KL7 L |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: only today ..., Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR at 4xf from a Raspberry Pi, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | LF: only today ..., Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |