My pleasure, Markus. The RX setup was far from optimal so your sigs
were very good indeed to be seen.
Your S/N is not at all bad considering how close your neighbours are.
Its nice to see the keying sidebands in the high res spectra.
My town may become more urbanised soon and my S/N will likely suffer.
OK on the D layer. That explains the transient naature of daytime TA.
73 Joe VO1NA
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Markus Vester wrote:
Oops, excuse me Joe for having mixed up first names! Guess I need more coffee...
Thank you for taking a break to look out for my transmissions.
Around 3 and 5 UT, your signal was strong enough here to show dogbones and 0.1 Hz DCF39
intermodulation. Warren's"XIL" appeared clearly as well, and a couple of traces
under 137779 (presumably John's XES) peeped through my own dashes around 3:30:
http://www.df6nm.de/grabber/LF_lastnight.htm
Although I have to admit that my receive SNR is still relatively mediocre,
compared to screenshots recently shown by others like Joe, Roelof and Henny.
All the best,
Markus
From: Markus Vester
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 9:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 136.1725 kHz DFCW
Hi Jay,
thanks very much for your capture, it's much appreciated! All seemed to be
working well here, ERP just under a watt, and no fires.
All the best,
Markus
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 2:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 136.1725 kHz DFCW
Hi Markus,
Sorry about the quality of this capture, but your sigs were clearly
crossing the pond. Using the tuned 100m wire and the FT-817 without
a preamp. This is your 0100 utc transmission.
Best 73
Joe VO1NA
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015, Markus Vester wrote:
It's a beautiful moonlit night... Starting 23 UT, I intend to send my callsign
every hour on 136.1725 Hz, DFCW 90.
All reports and captures welcome! Anyone to join in?
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
|