Re: LF: CW ETC

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: CW ETC
From:	John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 31 May 2014 12:11:29 +0200
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:to; bh=/DGBk2VzNdf/X6PA0uKFEHSer0jE70g4sg+0I08oEJk=; b=j4mfzW49Mi/u7uKyVT0EPsROiUZYct5IbXvaTg6pytbHVgM1vLX5gKfehGxUEBxaLj cWYgbvxD+EoZ3k6DlXYVPR+rtvTHmPVDr88Ip0ddH0hB3LHgeUiZ7IKDuYHy1ys9V2Ho P9qC/rj2jOKZBstccCTYVbveILsq+RksGvainM6/qRhfKs4Qnnwq1aTP5waLnV+S87+G zEaZncF4z53A1uOAoSki5kpO5ZdOhQsDI2appFp+U8KnxghDmDdCtfK1pTDsTQtzXd/e KCtmj8WS56e+pGwYZEPHoM4qTGypeAC5KDMRSIWsaKUEvd7U+EV4KYWi85r0kYC1Mrbj b3mg==
In-reply-to:	<B0093EAAD54D40418248AEDB99490D70@your91hoehfy9g>
References:	<B0093EAAD54D40418248AEDB99490D70@your91hoehfy9g>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

I suspect coast and ship stations used MCW on 500, and CW on working 
frequencies.

Am I right, Mal?

John F5VLF

On 31 May 2014, at 10:54, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

> MCW------- AM MODULATED TONE, BOTH CARRIER AND TONE KEYED
>  
> KEYED TONE---------- AM MODULATED TONE, ONLY TONE KEYED, CARRIER CONTINUOUS
>  
> FSK-------- FREQUENCY SHIFT KEYED, VARIOUS SHIFTS USED BUT 400 AND 800 CYCLES 
> COMMON ON HF
>  
> CW------- CARRIER KEYED
>  
>

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: CW ETC, mal hamilton Re: LF: CW ETC, John Rabson <=

Previous by Date:	LF: SV8CS, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios
Next by Date:	LF: CW ETC, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:	LF: CW ETC, mal hamilton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]