Here
http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN68KJ79WJ
DF3FF was fairly readable with R4
I was too late to watch his signal strength but he was not very strong,
several orders of magnitude below your signal.
Nobody was qrm'd by your keying sidebands. :-)
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
>Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 4:34 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LF: RE: LF CW, now!
>
>Thanks Dave, that sounds good :-)
>Did you hear DF3FF? I heared him RST359 but the signal was
>just to weak
>for a real QSO. Got his call and JO40 but not much more...
>Maybe he will do QRO by 6 dB, this would allow to make a real QSO...
>Thanks for listening.
>
>73, Stefan
>
>
>Am 18.05.2014 16:10, schrieb Dave G3WCB.:
>> Hi, Stefan.
>>
>> I'm copying your CW signal RST 589 at 14-10 utc with my
>SPM-30. That's
>> about -70dBm in a 24 Hz bandwidth. RX antenna is a 1.2m
>square tuned loop,
>> with pre-amp.
>>
>> 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of DK7FC
>> Sent: 18 May 2014 14:00
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: LF: LF CW, now!
>>
>>
>> LF!!!
>>
>> I have a sked with DF3FF who is a newcomer on LF. He doesn't like
>> internet and computers and preferrs CW! The sked is arround
>13:10 UTC on
>> 136.5 kHz. His location is somewhere in JO40.
>> If you want to try to hear him or to work him, don't
>hesitate to try it! :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>>
>
|
