To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 137 kHz LF T/A |
From: | John Andrews <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:05:50 -0400 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <7237B2B1AF3A47EDBE985AABDFBD97CF@PCFIXE> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <op.xd7oyq1nv16t3f@xn----rfameuhquf> <[email protected]> <4A845D55AC7B43CAAF854BD5F4FE616B@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <776DDB1AA79E4AAD876EB1C13CF23D5E@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <003101cf583d$1d0c2be0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <9DF70115B3394651A23CE7A750A87B5D@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <7237B2B1AF3A47EDBE985AABDFBD97CF@PCFIXE> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
Next night I also let SL around 137.780 kHz to receive your transmission. Why do you transmit on this frequency and not around 136.175 kHz ? Jean / F6HCC Jean,Because of all of the strong signals from EU at your end. The signal would be very weak compared to them. John, W1TAG/WD2XES |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 137 kHz LF T/A, f6hcc 56 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 137.778 tonite..., Bob Raide |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 137 kHz LF T/A, f6hcc 56 |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 137 kHz LF T/A, f6hcc 56 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |