Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VO1NA_OK2BVG

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA_OK2BVG
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:24:38 -0230 (NDT)
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sorry, TX QRG 477.7  RX 477.7.

73
Joe

On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote:

Joe,
Which qrg you will tx?
472.5 ?

Christian Groeger

[email protected] schrieb:

Hi Christian,

I will be QSX 477.7 at 2300 0030 and 0130 QRV for QSO and
will run beacon when not QSX. Thanks for QSP!

73
Joe

On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote:

Hi Joe,
Was just in QSO with Dj6CB.
He can hear you when you are QRO/cw.
He wants to know when you will be active again in cw, not beacon?
He has no email but I will qsp..
73, df5qg

Christian Groeger

[email protected] schrieb:

Hi Lubos,

Thank-you for trying.  Perhaps some day I will QRO!

Joe

On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Lubos wrote:

Hello Joe! I was listening on 477.7kHz but no signal here. Sorry, may be later 
:-)I made nice QSO with Finbar, on 472.5kHz.73!Lubos, OK2BVG

******************************************************

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:53:26 -0230
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz

Hi Lubos,

Please do join in!

73
Joe

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Lubos wrote:

Hello Joe and Christian!I am going to be on 630m as well. My favourite frq is 
472.7kHz. Can I join you?
Lubos, OK2BVG, JN88KS
**************************************************************************

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:17:49 -0230
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz

Hi Christian,

Yes, let's try for a real CW QSO tonight.  Will call 0000 utc and
on the half hours until 0200. Will listen 472.5 kHz if that's OK
with you.

We are having a blizzard so experimentation with the antenna
is out for today.  The TX might be convinced to give another 3 dB.
Let's hope that a fried FET is not in the future!


73
Joe VO1NA

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote:

Hi Joe,
Can you QRO a bit for a real CW QSO?
You told me last time, you heard me and I heard you as well...
73, df5qg

Christian Groeger

[email protected] schrieb:

Many thanks for the reply to my calls.  Your signals were also audible at
times.  BIA could be heard before our QSO and WD2SXH/7 was about 559 near
476 kHz towards the end.  Thank-you for staying up so late to make it all
happen! TX here 50 watts, ERP about 1 watt.

73
Joe VO1NA

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:

Hello Joe,

Many thanks also... just now, at the 'final dit', your signal is audible
again:



SNR in QRSS10 bandwidth (approx. 0.1 Hz) : over 30 dB !

73 and gn,
 Wolf DL4YHF
 JO42FD
 100 W, inv. L with 60 meter total wire length, horizontal part approx 11
meters above ground.
..zzz..



Am 22.03.2014 13:19, schrieb [email protected]:

Hello Wolf,

Many thanks for the details of your reception.  Sending audible sigs to  DL
was very gratifing.  There is some room to improve the ERP
and I look forward to experimenting with this.

73 and thanks again
Joe

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:

Greetings all,

Nice signal from Joe throughout the night, strongest around 04:00 UTC
here, but 'ever-present' between start and sunrise.
Multi-strip spectrogram covering the strongest part (which was audible
during the peaks at 03:45 UTC):

http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf/VO1NA_2014_03_22__04UTC.jpg

The signal began to drop at 05:00 UTC, which is in the upper right corner
of the screenshot.

Thanks for the test Joe. Hope to meet you in a QSO mode one day, for me
JT9-1 appears manageable...


73,
 Wolf  DL4YHF
  JO42RX
  RX: old IC-706 on 60 meter wire antenna resonated at 475 kHz,
preselector/preamp *off* .
















<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>