Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: SL. 47 uHz vs. 16 uHz @ 8270.005 Hz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: SL. 47 uHz vs. 16 uHz @ 8270.005 Hz
From: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:10:01 -0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <B113BF3D526D426DB240EE3730BB1C54@White> <B288B88E668242CAA91FC4A2F15EA298@Extensa> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Tnx Wolf for the quick explanation !
Perhaps 100uHz is the limit here, or perhaps 30 uHz.
Experiment continues :-)
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SL. 47 uHz vs. 16 uHz @ 8270.005 Hz

Hi Peter and all,

Am 28.02.2014 16:21, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
Hello VLF.
Just a experience message !
 
It seems that there is somewhere a perfect setting in "Width of FFT-bin", but where ?

A good question.. and not easily answered. I'd say "it all depends".
In this case, it depends on the soundcard's oscillator stability, despite stabilisation from the GPS sync pulse.
At 16 uHz frequency we seem to have reached a limit (for this type of oscillator drift compensation).

The next logical step would be building an A/D converter, or modifying a USB audio device to take the samping clock directly off a low-noise 'rock-solid reference' (a good GPS disciplined OCXO for example).
I have fragments for such a project laying on the workbench (a low-cost Cortex-M3 microcontroller development kit) but no time yet to put the bits (bytes) and pieces together.
At least, one would know of the Ionosphere (stability of the path length) or whatever else is the limiting factor.


GL and all the best,
  Wolf .

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>