Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: 8270.005 Hz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 8270.005 Hz
From: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:19:32 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <79434BB3E11148939AC5C57D5C131504@Extensa>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <79434BB3E11148939AC5C57D5C131504@Extensa>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Hi Peter, Uwe / LF

Taking a look at the signal from my 4324uHz and Peter's 238uHz to get similar size Grabs the pattern of drop outs over time is remarkably similar and must be propagation.
In the early afternoon my drop outs are abrupt and long lasting giving the impression of deliberate dashes.
See att.

73 Eddie

On 27/02/2014 22:57, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
Hello Eddie,
There are no breaks here.
Was there a break in your SR-cal source ?
Yes, all windows here show a constant carrier, but very short breaks now an then.
Not as long as in your 424 uHz window.
 
A few day's ago I did start a 16.7 uHz window.
Wondering what result that will produce !
Scrol interval 132 at 87.5 % overlap :-)
Have patience please !
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 8270.005 Hz


Hi Uwe, Peter

Interesting signals today, on my RX it looks like long and short dashes, Peters Grabber seems to show a constant carrier.
A nice clean positive carrier now in 47uHz some 7dB above noise peaks.

Nice to see the sigs.

73 Eddie


On 27/02/2014 22:17, [email protected] wrote:

and the .009Hz.

so it is:
.007Hz = dash
.003Hz = dot

.001Hz = dot
.009Hz = dash,

i.e. dashes above .005Hz and dots below .005Hz makes an X.

GL
Uwe/dj8wx



Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 27.02.2014 21:40
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: Re: 8270.005 Hz


Hello Uwe,
Good stable signal at the moment(27/2 - 21:40 UTC), but I think you take a look at my grabber now and then and you did see that already :-)
I don't understand castle mode and never learn it I think, so I can't decode yesterday's broadcast.
 
I can give U the frequ's of 25/2, but 26/2 is not clear to read... 
 
25/2
 
007
003
001
 
73's, Peter - PA1SDB
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 12:09 PM
Subject: LF: 8270.005 Hz

the TX is now on the air with carrier only, in phase corr PLL mode  of course.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx



Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 26.02.2014 17:53
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: LF: Fw: I can Cee Uuu :-) [ 8270.005 Hz ]


Hi Rodger and Eddie,
so I do announce herewith that the TX will stay on the air the coming night

with 5000sec/dashes forming a castle mode letter.

If the TX will be switched off during that time the reason would be bad WX / rain.

Uwe/dj8wx

GL


Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 26.02.2014 12:19
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Re: LF: Fw: I can Cee Uuu :-) [ 8270.005 Hz ]


Hi Uwe,

A LOT of folks would appreciate good warning of your intended transmissions at VLF. Presently,only those with grabbers already running are looking. You are missing many keen reporters.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 26 February 2014 11:59, <[email protected]> wrote:
yes, Eddie, I noticed it on the 424uHz grabber. thanks for that.
is the 47uHz grabber off?
GL
Uwe/dj8wx

Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 25.02.2014 23:09
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: LF: Fw: I can Cee Uuu :-) [ 8270.005 Hz ]


Hi Uwe

Your short stepped dashes are visible on my Grabber tonight I will leave it on overnight.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 24/02/2014 16:57, [email protected] wrote:

Yes, Markus, I know.

Would you pse send me the mail from Paul?

Thanks and GL

Uwe/dj8wx   






--


Attachment: zjo_dj8wx.jpg
Description: JPEG image

Attachment: sdb_dj8wx.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>