|
Thanks Joe for trying.
I think WSQ just needs a noise blanker against the
spherics. Now inserted SpecLab's noise blanker feeding VAC and WSQ and
the waterfall looks much more steady. Unfortunately this was only after your
last transmission...
Best 73,
Markus
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:42 AM
Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for
LF/MF
Markus,
Stefan.
I
stopped the TX now. Lets try again this evening, may be a little
earlier.
Thats
what I got:
Good
night
73
Joe
best I got so far:
...cq cq c.she df2jp df2jp df\jp ar ...
Just tried it: in
varicode, sending DF6NM takes about twice as long as
df6nm.
Sent: Wednesday, February
12, 2014 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSQ,A
Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF
That what i get here:
df2jp t t t j d|6nm pse k
kdfszdqpopcp b q t c e c|\i o ee\jo df3jo bq
knujnrqfdf2jp df2jp de df6nm df6nm ur mm mm
73,
Stefan
Am 12.02.2014 00:00, schrieb Markus Vester:
...sq cq cqqode df20r
c9cjp d...
...qnrcq mvqee dds'jp
df2jpyk f2jp ar...
I may have
picked up some of your call but it seems to be torn up by statics (and
perhaps DCF39). SNR peaked up to -25. Let's try a little
more...
Sent: Tuesday, February
11, 2014 10:59 PM
Subject: AW: LF: RE: WSQ,A
Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF
Hi
Markus, LF
First
decode here but strong qsb
|
