Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: WSQ MODE

from [mal hamilton] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "rsgb" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: WSQ MODE
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:41:58 -0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
LF/MF
If a trace can be seen on a waterfall for tuning purposes then why not use QRSS for a QSO.
QRSS is simple to generate and very effective for two way real time communications at appropriate speeds for propagation and distance at a given time.
I often observe data modes on a waterfall that could easily be identified had they been transmitted in QRSS MODE but will not decode.
I am sure most experienced LF/MF operators already know this.
73 de mal/G3KEV
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: WSQ MODE, mal hamilton <=
Previous by Date:  LF: De F6CNI : some QRP MF test this evening and night, André Guyé
Next by Date:  LF: I have trouble with QSB, what can I do?, Graham
Previous by Thread:  LF: New ver. of WSQ and the source code, Steinar Aanesland
Next by Thread:  LF: I have trouble with QSB, what can I do?, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]