Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Testing 8269.990

from [wolf_dl4yhf] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Testing 8269.990
From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:37:22 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <B63424F4A71C43E7A0ABC36F5FCF0843@Extensa>
References: <[email protected]> <B63424F4A71C43E7A0ABC36F5FCF0843@Extensa>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
Am 23.01.2014 17:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
Testing your .usr file now Uwe.
Testing on 3m wire and ~1 Watt notebook ouput.
RX antenna at 20 m distance.
 
Setpoint is 8270.010, but signal becomes visible at 8269.465 Hz.
I see that often with SL.
Why ?

Maybe one of those unfriendly cards (like the beast in my Z71m) where the sampling clock for the DAC is "slightly different" from the ADC's .. if so, try another one ..

73,
  Wolf .

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Re: LF: Testing 8269.990, PA1SDB, Peter
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Unknown signal, Hartmut Wolff
Previous by Thread:  Re: Re: LF: Testing 8269.990, PA1SDB, Peter
Next by Thread:  LF: Late start but on 74.3213 for rest of evening...,, Bob Raide
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]